Wiping it with his hand is not a condition, as evidenced by the case where one wipes it with the hand of another. The second viewpoint is that it does not suffice him, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) wiped with his hand. If he places a wet rag on his head and his head becomes wet (35) as a result, or he places a rag and then wets it until his hair is wet, it does not suffice him, because that is neither wiping nor washing. It is possible [to argue] that it does suffice him, because he wetted his hair intending wudu, so it suffices him, just as if he had washed it. If he wipes with one or two fingers, it suffices him if he wipes with them everything that is obligatory to wipe. Muhammad ibn al-Hakam narrated from Ahmad that it does not suffice him. The Qadi said: This is interpreted as referring to the obligation of covering the whole head, for it is impossible to cover the [entire] head with his finger; however, if he covers the whole of it, it suffices him, because he has wiped with a portion of his hand, resembling wiping with his palm.
Section: The ears are part of the head, and the analogy of the school of thought is that it is obligatory to wipe them along with it. Al-Khallal said: All of them narrated from Abu Abdullah, regarding the one who leaves their wiping intentionally or out of forgetfulness, that it suffices him. This is because they are appendages to the head, and the inclusion of them is not understood from the absolute term 'head', nor do they resemble the rest of the parts of the head. For this reason, their wiping does not suffice for wiping the head for those who deem it sufficient to wipe only a part of it. However, the preferred course is to wipe them along with it, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) wiped them with his head. Al-Rubayyi' narrated that she saw the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) wipe his head—what was at the front and what was at the back, his temples, and his ears—once (36). Ibn Abbas narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) wiped his head (37) and his ears, their exteriors and interiors (38). Al-Tirmidhi said: The hadith of Ibn Abbas and the hadith of al-Rubayyi' are authentic (39). Al-Miqdam ibn Ma'dikarib narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) wiped his head and his ears, and inserted his fingers into the auditory canals (40) of his ears. Abu Dawud recorded it (41). Thus, it is recommended that
(35) Omitted from the original. (36) The documentation of the hadith of al-Rubayyi' has preceded on page 150. (37) In M: "his head". (38) Recorded by al-Tirmidhi in: The Chapter on What Has Been Reported Regarding Wiping the Ears, Their Exteriors and Interiors, from the Book of Purification. Aridat al-Ahwadhi 1/54. (39) The wording of al-Tirmidhi is: "The hadith of Ibn Abbas is a hasan sahih (good and authentic) hadith." Preceding this was his statement after narrating the hadith of Ibn Abbas: "And in the chapter is [a report] from al-Rubayyi'." (40) In Sunan Abi Dawud: "simakh". The simakh is the hole of the ear. (41) In: The Chapter on the Description of the Wudu of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), from the Book of Purification. Sunan Abi Dawud 1/28.
مَسْحَه بيَدِه غَيْرُ مُشْتَرَطٍ، بدَلِيلِ ما لو مَسَحَه بِيَدِ غيرِه. والثانى، لا يُجْزِئه؛ لأنَّ النبيَّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- مَسَحَ بِيَدِه. وإن وَضَعَ عَلَى رَأسِه خِرْقَةً مَبْلُولَةً فابْتَلَّ بها (٣٥) رَأسُه، أو وَضَع خِرْقَةً ثم بَلَّها حتى ابْتَلَّ شَعْرُه، لَمْ يُجْزِئْه؛ لأنَّ ذلك ليس بمَسْحٍ ولا غَسْلٍ. ويَحْتَمِلُ أن يُجْزِئَه؛ لأنَّه بَلَّ شَعْرَه قاصِدًا للوُضُوءِ، فأجْزَأه، كما لو غَسَلَهُ. وإن مَسَحَ بإصْبَعٍ أو إصْبَعَيْنِ أجْزَأه إذا مَسَحَ بهما ما يَجِبُ مَسْحُه كلَّه. ونَقَلَ محمد بن الحَكَمِ، عن أحْمدَ، أنَّه لا يُجْزِئُه. قال القاضِى: هذا مَحْمُولٌ عَلَى وُجُوبِ الاسْتِيعابِ، فإنه لا يمْكِنه اسْتِيعاب الرَّأْسِ بإِصْبَعهِ، فأمَّا إنِ اسْتَوْعَبَه أجْزَأَهُ؛ لأنَّه مَسَحَ ببَعْضِ يَدِه، أشْبَهَ مَسْحَه بكَفِّهِ.
فصل: والأُذُنان من الرَّأْسِ، فَقِياسُ المَذْهَبِ وُجُوبُ مَسْحِهِما مَعَ مَسْحِه. وقال الخَلَّالُ: كُلُّهُم حَكَوْا عن أبي عَبْدِ اللَّه، فِيمَنْ تَرَكَ مَسْحَهُما عامِدًا أو ناسِيًا، أنَّه يُجْزِئُه؛ وذلك لأنَّهُما تَبَعٌ للرَّأْسِ، لا يُفْهَمُ مِنْ إطْلاقِ اسْمِ الرَّأسِ دُخُولُهُما فيه، ولا يُشْبِهانِ بَقِيَّةَ أجْزاءِ الرَّأْسِ، ولذلك لم يُجْزِهِ مَسْحُهما عن مَسْحِه عِنْدَ مَنِ اجْتَزَأَ بمَسْحِ بَعْضِه، والأَوْلَى مَسْحُهما مَعَه؛ لأنَّ النبيَّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- مَسَحَهُما معَ رَأْسِه، فَرَوَت الرُّبَيِّعُ، أنها رَأَت النبيَّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- مَسَحَ رَأسَه، ما أقْبَلَ منه ومَا أدْبَرَ وصُدْغَيْه وأُذُنَيْهِ مَرَّةً واحِدَةً (٣٦) ورَوَى ابنُ عَبَّاس، أنَّ النبيَّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- مَسَحَ برَأسَه (٣٧) وأُذُنَيْه ظَاهِرَهُما وباطِنَهُما (٣٨). وقال التِّرْمِذِىُّ: حَدِيثُ ابنِ عَبّاس وحَدِيثُ الرُّبَيّع صَحِيحان (٣٩). ورَوَى المِقْدامُ بنُ مَعْدِ يكَرِبَ. أن النبيَّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- مَسَحَ برَأْسِه وأُذُنَيْهِ، وأدْخَل إصْبَعَيْه في صِمَاخَىْ (٤٠) أُذُنَيْه. رَوَاه أبو دَاوُد (٤١). فيُسْتَحَبُّ أن
(٣٥) سقط من: الأصل.(٣٦) تقدم تخريج حديث الربيع صفحة ١٥٠.(٣٧) في م: "رأسه".(٣٨) أخرجه الترمذي، في: باب ما جاء في مسح الأذنين ظاهرهما وباطنهما، من كتاب الطهارة. عارضة الأحوذى ١/ ٥٤.(٣٩) عبارة الترمذي: "حديث ابن عباس حديث حسن صحيح". وسبق ذلك قوله بعد روايته حديث ابن عباس: "وفى الباب عن الرُّبَيِّع".(٤٠) في سنن أبي داود: "صماخ". والصماخ: خرق الأذن.(٤١) في: باب صفة وضوء رسول اللَّه -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-، من كتاب الطهارة. سنن أبي داود ١/ ٢٨.