Ubayd said: All of this belongs to the woman. Al-Shafi'i said: If he does that, she is entitled to the 'dowry of an equal', and the designation is invalid; because he reduced her dowry for the sake of this invalid condition; because the dowry is not mandatory except for the wife, as it is the compensation for her sexual access, so it remains unknown; because we need to add to the dowry what was reduced from it for the sake of this condition, and that is unknown, so it becomes invalid. Our argument is the statement of Allah the Almighty in the story of Shu'ayb, peace be upon him: {I wish to marry you to one of my two daughters on the condition that you work for me for eight years}. He made the dowry the labor for tending his sheep, and it was a condition for himself. Furthermore, the father is entitled to take from his child's wealth, evidenced by the saying of the Prophet (peace be upon him): "You and your wealth belong to your father," and his saying: "Your children are from the best of your earnings, so eat from their wealth." Abu Dawud recorded it, and al-Tirmidhi recorded something similar and said: It is a good (hasan) hadith. So if he stipulates something from the dowry for himself, it is a taking from his daughter's wealth, and he is entitled to that. Their claim that it is an invalid condition is refuted. The Qadi said: Even if he stipulated the entire dowry for himself, it would be valid, evidenced by the story of Shu'ayb, for he stipulated the entirety for himself. And if he marries her for a thousand for her and a thousand for her father, then she is divorced before consummation, the husband returns to her for half of what she took, and the father is not liable for anything of what he took; because divorce before consummation necessitates half the dowry, and the two thousand are her entire dowry, so he returns to her for half of them, which is one thousand, and the father is not liable for anything because he took one thousand from his daughter's wealth, so it is not permissible to seek return of it from him. This is in the case where he had already handed her the two thousand. If he divorced her before he handed them over, one thousand is dropped from the husband's obligation, and one thousand remains owed by him to the wife, from which the father takes what he wishes. The Qadi said: It is divided between them in halves. And he said:
(1) Surah al-Qasas 27. (2) Its authentication (takhrij) was provided previously in: 8/273. (3) Its authentication was provided previously in: 8/263. (4) In the original: "the totality" (al-majmu'). (5) In [M]: "for half of both of them". (6) In [B] and [M]: "had handed them over to her". (7) In [A]: "and he takes".
عُبَيْدٍ: يكونُ كلُّ ذلك للمرأةِ. وقال الشافعىُّ: إذا فعل ذلك، فلها مَهْرُ المِثْلِ، وتَفْسُدُ التَّسْمِيَةُ؛ لأنَّه نَقَصَ من صَداقِها لأجْلِ هذا الشَّرْطِ الفاسدِ؛ لأنَّ المَهْرَ لا يجبُ إلَّا للزَّوْجةِ؛ لأنَّه عِوَضُ بُضْعِها، فيَبْقَى مَجْهُولًا؛ لأنَّنا نحتاجُ أن نَضُمَّ إلى المَهْرِ ما نَقَصَ منه لأجْلِ هذا الشَّرْطِ، وذلك مَجْهُولٌ فيَفْسُدُ. ولَنا، قولُ اللَّه تعالى، فى قِصَّةِ شُعَيْبٍ عليه السلام: {إِنِّى أُرِيدُ أَنْ أُنْكِحَكَ إِحْدَى ابْنَتَيَّ هَاتَيْنِ عَلَى أَنْ تَأْجُرَنِي ثَمَانِيَ حِجَجٍ} (١). فجَعلَ الصَّداقَ الإِجارةَ على رِعايةِ غَنَمِه، وهو شَرْطٌ لِنَفْسِه، ولأنَّ للوالدِ الأخْذ من مالِ وَلَدِه، بِدَليلِ قولِه -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-: "أنْتَ ومَالُكَ لأَبِيكَ" (٢). وقولِه: "إنَّ أوْلَادَكُم مِنْ أَطْيَبِ كَسْبِكُم، فَكُلُوا مِنْ أمْوالِهِمْ". أخْرَجه أبو داودَ، ونحوَه التِّرْمِذِىُّ (٣). وقال: حديثٌ حسنٌ. فإذا شَرَطَ لنَفْسِه شيئًا من الصَّداقِ، يكونُ ذلك أخْذًا من مالِ ابْنَتِه، وله ذلك. وقولُهم: إنَّه شَرْطٌ فاسدٌ. ممنوعٌ. قال القاضى: ولو شَرَطَ جميعَ الصَّداقِ لنَفْسِه، صَحَّ، بدليلِ قِصَّةِ شُعَيْبٍ، فإنَّه شَرَطَ الجميعَ (٤) لنفسِه. وإذا تزوجَها على ألْفٍ لها، وألفٍ لأِبيها، فطُلِّقتْ قبلَ الدُّخولَ، رجَع الزَّوْجُ فى الألْفِ الذى قَبَضَتْه، ولم يَكُنْ على الأبِ شىءٌ ممَّا أخَذَ؛ لأنَّ الطَّلاقَ قبلَ الدُّخولِ يُوجِبُ نِصْفَ الصَّداقِ، والألْفان جميعُ صَدَاقِها، فرَجَعَ عليها بنِصْفِهما (٥)، وهو ألفٌ، ولم يكُنْ على الأبِ شىءٌ؛ لأنَّه أخَذَ من مالِ ابنتِه ألْفًا، فلا يجوزُ الرُّجُوعُ عليه به. وهذا فيما إذا كان قد قَبَّضَها (٦) الألْفَيْنِ. ولو طَلَّقها قبلَ قَبْضِهِما، سَقَطَ عن الزَّوْجِ أَلْفٌ، وبَقِىَ عليه ألفٌ للزَّوْجةِ، يأخُذُ (٧) الأبُ منها ما شاء. وقال القاضى: يكونُ بينهما نِصْفَيْنِ. وقال:
(١) سورة القصص ٢٧.(٢) تقدم تخريجه فى: ٨/ ٢٧٣.(٣) تقدم تخريجه فى: ٨/ ٢٦٣.(٤) فى الأصل: "المجموع".(٥) فى م: "بنصفيهما".(٦) فى ب، م: "أقبضها".(٧) فى أ: "ويأخذ".