that. This is because for that which is considered a statement, the statement itself suffices without intention if it is explicit regarding it, such as in a sale. It is the same whether he intends jest or earnestness, due to the saying of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him): "Three things, their earnestness is earnest and their jest is earnest: marriage, divorce, and the return (of a wife)." It was narrated by Abu Dawud and al-Tirmidhi, who said: It is a hasan (good) hadith. Ibn al-Mundhir said: Everyone among the scholars whom I have memorized from has reached a consensus that the earnestness of divorce and its jest are the same. This is narrated from Umar ibn al-Khattab and Ibn Masud. A similar view is from Ata and Abidah. This is also the view of al-Shafii and Abu Ubayd. Abu Ubayd said: It is the opinion of Sufyan and the people of Iraq. As for the wording of 'separation' (firaq) and 'release' (sarah), it depends on the disagreement regarding it; whoever considers it explicit causes divorce by it without intention, and whoever does not consider it explicit does not cause divorce by it until he intends it, and it stands in the position of hidden metonymies.
Section: If a non-Arab (a'jami) says to his wife, "You are divorced (anti taliq)," and he does not understand its meaning, she is not divorced because he is not choosing divorce, so his divorce does not occur, like the one who is coerced. If he intends its requirement according to the people of the Arabic language, it does not occur either, because he cannot validly choose what he does not know. For this reason, if someone who does not know the meaning of a word of disbelief speaks it, he does not become a disbeliever. It is possible that she would be divorced if he intended its requirement, because he uttered the divorce while intending its requirement, thus resembling the Arab. The same ruling applies if an Arab says: "Bahushtum" (in a foreign language) while not knowing its meaning.
Section: If he says to his wife and a stranger: "One of you is divorced," or says to his mother-in-law: "Your daughter is divorced," while she has a daughter other than his wife, or his wife's name is Zaynab and he says: "Zaynab is divorced," his wife is divorced because he does not own the divorce of anyone else. If he says: "I meant the stranger," he is not believed. Ahmad stated this textually regarding a man who married a woman, then said to his mother-in-law: "Your daughter is divorced," and said: "I meant your other daughter, who is not my wife."
(1) In B and M: "kanat" (feminine). (2) Recorded by Abu Dawud in: The Chapter on Divorce in Jest, from the Book of Marriage. Sunan Abi Dawud 1/507. And al-Tirmidhi, in: The Chapter on what has come regarding earnestness and jest in divorce, from the Book of Divorce. Aridat al-Ahwadhi 5/156, 157. It was also recorded by Ibn Majah, in: The Chapter on the one who divorces, marries, or returns his wife while playing, from the Book of Divorce. Sunan Ibn Majah 1/658. (3) Omitted from A, B, and M. (4) Meaning: al-Salmani. It preceded in: 1/93.
ذلك. ولأنَّ ما يُعتبَرُ له القَول يُكْتَفَى فيه به، مِن غيرِ نِيَّةٍ، إذا كان (١) صريحًا فيه، كالبيعِ. وسواء قَصَدَ المَزْحَ أو الجِدَّ؛ لقولِ النَّبِىِّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-: "ثَلَاثٌ جِدُّهُنَّ جِدٌّ وَهَزْلُهُنَّ جِدٌّ؛ النِّكَاحُ، وَالطَّلَاقُ، وَالرَّجْعَةُ". روَاه أبو داودَ، والتِّرمِذِىُّ (٢)، وقال: حديثٌ حَسَنٌ. قال ابنُ المُنْذِرِ: أجْمَعَ كُلُّ (٣) مَن أحفظُ عنه من أهلِ العلمِ، على أنَّ جِدَّ الطَّلاقِ وهَزْلَه سواءٌ. رُوِىَ هذا عن عمرَ بنِ الخطَّابِ، وابنِ مسعودٍ. ونحوُه عن عَطاءٍ، وعَبِيدَةَ (٤). وبه قال الشَّافعىُّ، وأبو عُبَيدٍ. قال أبو عُبَيْدٍ: وهو قولُ سفيانَ، وأهلِ العراقِ. فأَمَّا لفظُ الفِرَاقِ والسَّراحِ، فيَنْبَنِى على الخلافِ فيه؛ فَمَنْ جعله صَريحًا أوقعَ به الطَّلاقَ مِن غيرِ نِيَّةٍ، ومَن لم يَجْعلْه صريحًا لم يُوقِعْ به الطَّلاقَ حتى يَنْوِيَه، ويَكونُ بمنزلةِ الكناياتِ الخَفِيَّةِ.
فصل: فإن قال الأعْجَمِىُّ لامرأتِه: أنتِ طالقٌ، ولا يَفْهَمُ معناه، لم تَطْلُقْ؛ لأنَّه ليس بمُخْتارٍ للطَّلاقِ، فلم يَقَعْ طلاقُه، كالمُكْرَهِ. فإن نَوَى مُوجِبَه عندَ أهلِ العربيَّةِ، لم يَقعْ أيضًا؛ لأنَّه لا يَصحُّ منه اخْتيارُ ما لا يَعلمُه، ولذلك لو نطقَ بكلمةِ الكُفْرِ مَنْ لا يَعلمُ معناها لم يَكْفُرْ. ويَحْتمِلُ أن تَطْلُقَ إذا نَوَى مُوجِبَها؛ لأنَّه لَفَظَ بالطَّلاقِ ناويًا مُوجِبَه، فأشْبَهَ العربِىَّ. وكذلك الحُكمُ إذا قال العربِىُّ: بهشتم. وهو لا يَعلمُ معناها.
فصل: فإن قال لزوجتِه وأجْنبِيَّةٍ: إحداكما طالقٌ. أو قال لحَماتِه: ابنتُك طالقٌ. ولها بنتٌ سِوَى امرأتِه. أو كان اسمُ زوجتِه زينبُ، فقال: زينبُ طالقٌ. طَلُقَتْ زوجتُه؛ لأنَّه لا يَمْلِكُ طلاقَ غيرِها. فإن قال: أرَدْتُ الأجْنبِيَّةَ. لم يُصَدَّقْ. نَصَّ عليه
(١) فى ب، م: "كانت".(٢) أخرجه أبو داود فى: باب فى الطلاق على الهزل، من كتاب النكاح. سنن أبى داود ١/ ٥٠٧. والترمذى، فى: ياب ما جاء فى الجد والهزل فى الطلاق، من كتاب الطلاق. عارضة الأحوذى ٥/ ١٥٦، ١٥٧.كما أخرجه ابن ماجه، فى: باب من طلق أو نكح أو راجع لاعبا، من كتاب الطلاق. سنن ابن ماجه ١/ ٦٥٨.(٣) سقط من: أ، ب، م.(٤) أى: السلمانى. وتقدم فى: ١/ ٩٣.