the condition, and does it suffice him for the Zihar? There are two views regarding this. One of them is that it suffices him, because it was emancipated after the Zihar, and he had intended to emancipate it for the expiation. The second is that it does not suffice him, because its emancipation was mandatory due to another cause, which is the condition, and because the intention was not present at the time of the slave's emancipation, and the intention at the time of the conditional suspension does not suffice, as it would be advancing it before its cause. If he says to his slave, "If I practice Zihar, you are free for my Zihar," the ruling is the same, because it is a conditional suspension of his emancipation upon the Zihar.