ShamelaTranslate
Search
Sign in
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. Scholarly Open-Access Project.

AboutContactDonateImprintPrivacyTermsRight of WithdrawalCancel a subscription
Al-Mughni by Ibn Qudama - Edited by Al-Turki
Volume 11 · Page 1441329 - Issue: He said: (Whenever they perform li'an and the judge separates them, they shall never be reunited)

Translation · EN

the tongue; therefore, the difference in it has no effect, just as if one of them testified that he admitted to accusing her on Thursday in Arabic, and the other testified that he admitted to accusing her on Friday in a non-Arabic language. The other [perspective] is that the testimony is not completed. This is the school of al-Shafi'i; because they are two accusations, and the testimony has not been completed regarding either one of them, so it is not established, just as if one of them testified that he married her on Thursday, and the other testified that he married her on Friday. It differs from admission of the accusation, because it is possible that the one who admitted is the same person, and he admitted to it at two times in two languages.

1329 - Issue: He said: (Whenever they perform li'an and the ruler separates them, they shall never reunite).

There are two issues in this matter:

One of them: That the separation between the two who performed li'an does not occur except by their performing li'an together. As for whether the separation by the ruler between them is considered, there are two narrations: One of them is that it is considered, so the separation does not occur until the ruler separates them. This is the apparent view of al-Khiraqi and the position of the Scholars of Opinion (ashab al-ra'y), because of what Ibn Abbas said in his hadith: "Then the Messenger of Allah - may Allah bless him and grant him peace - separated them." This implies that the separation did not occur before it. In the hadith of Uwaymir, he said: "I have lied against her, O Messenger of Allah, if I keep her." So he divorced her three times before the Messenger of Allah - may Allah bless him and grant him peace - ordered him. This implies the possibility of keeping her, and that his divorce took effect. If the separation had occurred before that, his divorce would not have taken effect, nor would it have been possible for him to keep her. Also, because the cause of this separation depends on the ruler, so the separation related to it does not occur except by the judgment of the ruler, like the separation due to impotence (unnah).

Notes

(34) Omitted from: A, M. (35) In A: "that he accused her". (1) In M: "by their li'an". (2) Its documentation was mentioned previously, in: 8/373. (3) Its documentation was mentioned previously, in: 10/330. (4) In A, B, and M: "did not".

Arabic (Source)

اللِّسانُ، فلم يُؤَثِّر الاختلافُ فيه (٣٤)، كما لو شَهِد أحَدُهما أنَّه أقَرَّ بقَذْفِها (٣٥) يومَ الخميسِ بالعَرَبِيَّةِ، وشَهِدَ الآخرُ أنَّه أقَرَّ بقَذْفِها يوم الجُمُعةِ بالعَجَمِيَّةِ. والآخَرُ، لا تَكْمُلُ الشَّهادةُ. وهو مذهبُ الشافعىِّ؛ لأنَّهما قَذْفانِ لم تَتِمَّ الشَّهادةُ على واحدٍ منهما، فلم تَثْبُتْ، كما لو شَهِدَ أحَدُهما أنَّه تَزَوَّجَها يومَ الخميسِ، وشهدَ الآخرُ أنَّه تزوَّجَها يومَ الجمعةِ، وفارَقَ الإِقْرارَ بالقَذْفِ، فإنَّه يجوزُ أَنَّ يكونَ المُقِرُّ به واحدًا، أقَرَّ به فى وَقْتَيْنِ بلِسَانَيْنِ.

١٣٢٩ - مسألة؛ قال: (فمَتَى تَلَاعَنَا وفَرَّقَ الحاكِمُ بينهما، لم يَجتَمِعا أبدًا).

فى هذه المسْألةِ مَسْألتان:

إحداهما: أَنَّ الفُرْقَةَ بين المُتَلَاعِنَيْنِ لا تَحْصُلُ إلَّا بتَلاعُنِهما (١) جميعًا، وهل يُعْتَبَرُ تَفْرِيقُ الحاكمِ بينهما؛ فيه رِوَايَتان، إحداهما، أنَّه مُعْتَبر فلا تحصُلُ الفُرْقةُ حتى يُفَرِّقَ الحاكمُ بينهما. وهو ظاهرُ كلامِ الْخِرَقِىِّ، وقولُ أصْحاب الرَّأْى، لقولِ ابنِ عباسٍ فى حدِيِثه: ففَرَّقَ رسولُ اللَّه -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- بينهما (٢). وهذا يَقْتَضِى أَنَّ الفُرْقةَ لم تَحْصُلْ قبلَه. وفى حَدِيثِ عُوَيْمِرٍ، قال: كَذَبْتُ عليها يا رَسُولَ اللَّه إن أمْسَكْتُها. فطَلَّقَها ثَلاثًا قبلَ أَنَّ يَأْمُرَه رسولُ اللَّه -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- (٣). وهذا يَقْتَضِى إمْكانَ إمْساكِها، وأنَّه وَقَعَ طَلَاقُه، ولو كانت الفُرْقةُ وَقَعَتْ قبلَ ذلك، لَما وَقَعَ طَلاقُه، ولا أمْكَنَه إمْساكُها. ولأنَّ سَبَبَ هذه الفُرْقةِ يَقِفُ على الحاكمِ، فالفُرْقةُ المتعلِّقةُ به لا (٤) تَقَعُ إلَّا بحُكْمِ الحاكِم، كفُرْقةِ العُنَّةِ.

Notes

(٣٤) سقط من: أ، م.(٣٥) فى أ: "أنه قذفها".(١) فى م: "بلعانهما".(٢) تقدم تخريجه، فى: ٨/ ٣٧٣.(٣) تقدم تخريجه، فى: ١٠/ ٣٣٠.(٤) فى أ، ب، م: "لم".

PreviousVolume 11 · Page 144Next
Previous11·144Next