The Sacred Law only brought about the separation after the completion of the cause, so it is not permissible before it, just like all other causes. What they cited is an arbitrary claim that has no evidence and no basis. Furthermore, it is invalidated by the case where a man and one woman testify regarding a debt, or regarding one upon whom the oath has been directed when he brings the majority of its wording, or in a competition when one says: "Whoever reaches five hits first," and he reaches three, and with all other causes. As for when the li'an is completed, the ruler may separate them without their permission, because the Prophet - may Allah bless him and grant him peace - separated the two who performed li'an without asking their permission. Malik narrated from Nafi' from Ibn Umar that a man performed li'an with his wife during the time of the Messenger of Allah - may Allah bless him and grant him peace - and disavowed her child, so the Messenger of Allah - may Allah bless him and grant him peace - separated them and attached the child to the woman. Sufyan also narrated from al-Zuhri from Sahl ibn Sa'd, who said: "I witnessed the Messenger of Allah - may Allah bless him and grant him peace - separate the two who performed li'an." Sa'id extracted both of these. Whenever we say that the separation does not occur except through the ruler's separation, if he does not separate them, the marriage remains in its state because that which invalidates the marriage has not occurred; therefore, it resembles the case as if they had not performed li'an.
Section: The separation of li'an is a dissolution (faskh). Al-Shafi'i held this view. Abu Hanifah said: It is a divorce (talaq), because it is a separation originating from the husband that pertains specifically to the marriage; thus, it is a divorce, like the separation caused by his saying: "You are divorced." Our argument is that it is a separation that necessitates an eternal prohibition, so it is a dissolution, like the separation due to breastfeeding. Furthermore, the li'an is not explicit regarding divorce, nor did he intend divorce by it; therefore, it is not a divorce, like all other things by which a marriage is dissolved. Moreover, if it were a divorce, it would occur by the husband's li'an alone, without the woman's li'an.
(17) In the original: "wa-sa'ir". (18) In: "Chapter on what has been reported regarding li'an," from the Book of Divorce, al-Sunan 1/359. The first [hadith] was also recorded by al-Bukhari, in: "Chapter on attaching the child to the woman who performed li'an," from the Book of Divorce, and in: "Chapter on the inheritance of the woman who performed li'an," from the Book of Inheritance (Fara'id), Sahih al-Bukhari 7/72, 8/191. Muslim, in: The Book of Li'an, Sahih Muslim 2/1132, 1133. Al-Tirmidhi, in: "Chapter on what has been reported regarding li'an," from the Chapters on Divorce, 'Aridat al-Ahwadhi 5/188, 189. Al-Nasa'i, in: "Chapter on the disavowal of a child through li'an and attaching him to his mother," from the Book of Divorce, al-Mujtaba 6/146. Ibn Majah, in: "Chapter on li'an," from the Book of Divorce, Sunan Ibn Majah 1/669. Al-Darimi, in: "Chapter on li'an," from the Book of Marriage, Sunan al-Darimi 2/151. Imam Malik, in: "Chapter on what has been reported regarding li'an," from the Book of Divorce, al-Muwatta 2/567. Imam Ahmad, in: al-Musnad 2/27, 64, 71, 126.
إنَّما وَرَدَ بالتَّفْريقِ بعدَ كَمالِ السَّبَبِ، فلم يَجُزْ قبلَه، كسائرِ الأسْبابِ، وما ذكَرُوه تَحَكم لا دَلِيلَ عليه، ولا أصْلَ له، ثم يَبْطُلُ بما إذا شَهِدَ بالدَّيْنِ رَجُلٌ وامرأةٌ واحدةٌ. أو بمَن تَوَجَّهَتْ عليه اليمينُ إذا أتَى بأكثرِ حُرُوفِها، وبالمسابقةِ إذا قال: مَنْ سَبَقَ إلى خَمْسِ إصاباتٍ. فسَبَقَ إلى ثلاثةٍ، وبسائرِ (١٧) الأسْبابِ، فأمَّا إذا تَمَّ اللِّعانُ، فلِلحاكمِ أَن يُفَرِّقَ بينهما من غيرِ اسْتِئْذانِهِما؛ لأنَّ النَّبِىَّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- فَرَّقَ بين المُتلاعِنَيْنِ، ولم يَسْتَأْذِنْهُما. ورَوَى مالكٌ، عن نافعٍ، عن ابنِ عمرَ، أنَّ رَجُلًا لَاعَنَ امرأتَه فى زَمَنِ رسولِ اللَّه -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-، وانْتَفَى من وَلَدِها، ففَرَّقَ رسولُ اللَّه -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- بينهما، وألْحَقَ الولدَ بالمَرْأةِ. وروَى سُفْيانُ، عن الزُّهْرِىِّ، عن سَهْلِ بن سعدٍ، قال: شَهِدْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّه -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- فَرَّقَ بين المُتلاعِنَيْنِ. أخْرَجَهُما سعيدٌ (١٨). ومتى قُلْنا: إنَّ الفُرْقةَ لا تحصلُ إلَّا بتَفْريقِ الحاكمِ. فلم يُفَرِّقْ بينهما، فالنّكاحُ باقٍ بحالِه؛ لأنَّ ما يبطِلُ النِّكاحَ لم يُوجَدْ، فأشْبَهَ ما لو لم يُلَاعِنْ.
فصل: وفُرْقةُ اللِّعانِ فَسْخٌ. وبهذا قال الشافعىُّ. وقال أبو حنيفةَ: هى طَلَاقٌ؛ لأنَّها فُرْقة من جهَةِ الزَّوجِ، تَخْتَصُّ النّكاحَ، فكانت طلاقًا، كالفُرْقةِ بقَوْلِه: أنتِ طالِقٌ. ولَنا، أنَّها فُرْقةٌ توُجِبُ تَحْرِيمًا مُؤَبَّدًا، فكانتْ فَسْخًا، كفُرْقةِ الرَّضاعِ، ولأنَّ اللِّعانَ ليس بصَرِيحٍ فى الطَّلاقِ، ولا نَوَى به الطَّلاقَ، فلم يكُنْ طلاقًا، كسائرِ ما يَنْفَسِخُ به النِّكاحُ، ولأنَّه لو كان طَلاقًا، لوَقَعَ بلِعانِ الزَّوْجِ دُونَ لِعَانِ المرأةِ.
(١٧) فى الأصل: "وسائر".(١٨) فى: باب ما جاء فى اللعان، من كتاب الطلاق. السنن ١/ ٣٥٩.كما أخرج الأول البخارى، فى: باب يلحق الولد بالملاعنة، من كتاب الطلاق، وفى: باب ميراث الملاعنة، من كتاب الفرائض. صحيح البخارى ٧/ ٧٢، ٨/ ١٩١. ومسلم، فى: كتاب اللعان. صحيح مسلم ٢/ ١١٣٢، ١١٣٣. والترمذى، فى: باب ما جاء فى اللعان، من أبواب الطلاق. عارضة الأحوذى ٥/ ١٨٨، ١٨٩. والنسائى، فى: باب نفى الولد باللعان وإلحاقه بأمه، من كتاب الطلاق. المجتبى ٦/ ١٤٦. وابن ماجه، فى: باب فى اللعان، من كتاب الطلاق. سنن ابن ماجه ١/ ٦٦٩. والدارمى، فى: باب فى اللعان، من كتاب النكاح. سنن الدارمى ٢/ ١٥١. والإمام مالك، فى: باب ما جاء فى اللعان، من كتاب الطلاق. الموطأ ٢/ ٥٦٧. والإمام أحمد، فى: المسند ٢/ ٢٧، ٦٤، ٧١، ١٢٦.