khalifa [one-year-old she-camel], and its aggravation in gold and silver is to consider the value of the camels without aggravation, and their value with aggravation, then rule based on the increase between the two, as if their value without aggravation were six hundred, and in the case of intentional killing it were eight hundred, which is one-third of the non-aggravated blood money. According to Malik, it is aggravated only for the father, mother, and grandfather, and no one else. They argued regarding the mode of aggravation based on what was narrated from Umar, may Allah be pleased with him, that he took from Qatada al-Mudliji the blood money for his son when he struck him with a sword, consisting of thirty hiqqa, thirty jadha'a, and forty khalifa, and he did not increase the number at all (22). This is an incident that became famous and was not denied, so it constitutes consensus. Furthermore, what requires aggravation requires it in the teeth [age of camels], not in the quantity, like compensation. Two aggravations cannot be combined, because when causes requiring aggravation by compensation combine, they interpenetrate (23), like the Sacred Precinct and the state of ihram in killing game. Regarding the claim that it is not aggravated by ihram, it is because the Sacred Law did not specify its aggravation. Our companions argued based on what Ibn Abi Najih narrated, that a woman was trampled to death during the circumambulation [tawaf] (24), and Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him, ruled in her case with six thousand, and two thousand as an aggravation for the Sacred Precinct (25). From Ibn Umar, it is reported that he said: Whoever kills in the Sacred Precinct, or a close relative, or in the Sacred Month, owes one and one-third blood moneys (26). From Ibn Abbas, that a man killed a man in the Sacred Month and in the Sacred City. He said: His blood money is twelve thousand, for the Sacred Month is four thousand, and for the Sacred City is four thousand (27). This is something that became apparent and spread, and it was not denied, thus it is established as a consensus. This includes combining three aggravations, and because it is the position of the Successors who held the view of aggravation.