ShamelaTranslate
Search
Sign in
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. Scholarly Open-Access Project.

AboutContactDonateImprintPrivacyTermsRight of WithdrawalCancel a subscription
Al-Mughni by Ibn Qudama - Edited by Al-Turki
Volume 12 · Page 526Section

Translation · EN

As for us, we rely on the hadith of Abu Burda, and al-Shalanji narrated with his isnad from the Prophet (may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) that he said: "Whoever reaches a hadd (punishment) in a matter that is not a hadd is among the transgressors." (15) This is because the punishment should be commensurate with the crime and the sin, and the sins for which hadd punishments have been explicitly ordained are greater than others; therefore, it is not permissible for the punishment in the lesser of the two matters to reach or exceed that of the greater one. What they have argued would lead to the conclusion that someone who kisses a woman unlawfully would be struck more than the hadd for adultery, and this is not permissible; for if adultery, with its gravity and obscenity, cannot be exceeded in its hadd, then that which is less than it is more deserving of this restriction. As for the hadith of Ma'n, it is possible that he had many sins for which he was disciplined for all of them, or that the act of taking was repeated by him, or that his offense involved multiple crimes: one of which was his forgery, the second was his taking money from the public treasury without right, and the third was his opening the door to such a ruse for others, along with other factors. As for the hadith of al-Najashi, Ali struck him the hadd for his drinking, then disciplined him with twenty lashes for breaking the fast, so he did not reach the level of a hadd with his tazir. Ahmad adopted this view and held (16) that whoever drinks wine in Ramadan is to be given the hadd, then disciplined for his offense from two aspects. What points to the correctness of what we have mentioned is what was narrated that Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote to Abu Musa that he should not reach (17) more than twenty lashes in corporal punishment (18).

Section: Tazir is carried out through lashing, imprisonment, and public rebuke. It is not permissible to cut any part of his body, nor to wound him, nor to seize his wealth; because the Sharia has not provided for any of that from anyone whose example is to be followed, and because the duty is disciplinary, and discipline is not achieved (19) through destruction.

Section: Tazir in matters where tazir has been prescribed is obligatory, if the Imam deems it necessary. Malik and Abu Hanifa held this view. Al-Shafi'i said: 'It is not obligatory,' because a man came to the Prophet (may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and said: 'I met

Notes

(15) Reported by al-Bayhaqi, in: The Chapter on what has been narrated regarding tazir and that it should not reach forty lashes, from the Book of Drinks and the Hadd punishments related to them. al-Sunan al-Kubra 8/327. (16) In M: "wa-ruwiya" (and it was narrated). (17) In M: "yabgh" (the word is misspelled in the manuscript). (18) Reported by Abd al-Razzaq, in: The Chapter on not reaching the level of hadd punishments with corporal punishments, from the Book of Divorce. al-Musannaf 7/413. (19) In B there is the addition: "illa" (except).

Arabic (Source)

ولَنا، حديثُ أبى بُرْدَةَ، وروى الشَّالَنْجِىُّ بإسْنادِه عن النَّبِيِّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-، أنَّه قال: "مَنْ بَلَغَ حدًّا في غيرِ حَدٍّ، فَهُوَ مِنَ المُعْتَدِينَ" (١٥). ولأنَّ العقوبةَ على قدرِ الإِجْرامِ والمَعْصِيَةِ، والمعاصِى المنصوصُ على حُدودِها أعظمُ من غيرِها، فلا يجوزُ أن يبْلُغَ في أهْونِ الأمرَيْنِ عُقوبةَ أعْظَمِهما. وما قالوه يُؤَدِّى إلى أنَّ من قَبَّلَ امرأةً حَرامًا، يُضْربُ أكثرَ من حَدِّ الزِّنَى، وهذا غيرُ جائزٍ؛ لأنَّ الزِّنَى مع عِظَمِه وفُحْشِه، لا يجوزُ أن يُزادَ على حَدِّه، فما دونَه أوْلَى. فأمَّا حديثُ مَعْنٍ، فيَحْتَمِلُ أنَّه كانت له ذُنوبٌ كثيرةٌ، فَأُدِّبَ على جميعِها، أو تكرَّرَ منه الأخْذُ، أو كَانَ ذَنْبُه مُشْتَمِلًا على جناياتٍ أحَدُها تَزْويرُه، والثانى أخْذُه لمالِ بيتِ المالِ بغير حَقِّه، والثالثُ فَتْحُه بابَ هذه الحِيلَةِ لغيرِه، وغيرُ هذا. وأمَّا حديثُ النَّجَاشِىِّ، فإنَّ عليًّا ضربَه الحَدَّ لشُرْبِه، ثم عَزَّرَه عشرين لفِطْرِه، فلم يبلُغْ بتَعْزِيرِه حَدًّا. وقد ذهبَ أحمدُ إلى هذا، ورأَى (١٦) أنَّ من شَرِبَ الخمرَ في رمضانَ يُحَدُّ، ثم يعزَّرُ لجنايتِه مِن وَجْهين. والذي يدُلُّ على صِحَّةِ ما ذكرْناه، ما رُوِىَ أنَّ عمرَ، رَضِىَ اللهُ عنه، كتبَ إلى أبى موسى، أنْ لا يَبْلُغَ (١٧) بنَكالٍ أكثرَ من عشرين سَوْطًا (١٨).

فصل: والتَّعْزيرُ يكونُ بالضَّرْبِ والحَبْسِ والتَّوْبيخ. ولا يجوزُ قَطْعُ شَىْءٍ منه، ولا جَرْحُه، ولا أخْذُ مالِه؛ لأنَّ الشَّرْعَ لم يَرِدْ بشيءٍ من ذلك عن أحَدٍ يُقْتَدَى به، ولأنَّ الواجِبَ أَدَبٌ، والتأديبُ لا يكونُ (١٩) بالإِتْلافِ.

فصل: والتَّعْزِيرُ فيما شُرِعَ فيه التَّعْزيرُ واجِبٌ، إذا رآه الإِمامُ. وبه قال مالِكٌ، وأبو حنيفةَ، وقال الشَّافِعِىُّ: ليس بواجِبٍ؛ لأنَّ رجلًا جاءَ إلى النَّبِيِّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- فقال: إنِّي لَقِيتُ

Notes

(١٥) وأخرجه البيهقي، في: باب ما جاء في التعزير وأنه لا يبلغ به أربعين، من كتاب الأشربة والحد فيها. السنن الكبرى ٨/ ٣٢٧.(١٦) في م: "وروى".(١٧) في م: "يبغ".(١٨) أخرجه عبد الرزاق، في: باب لا يبلغ بالحدود العقوبات، من كتاب الطلاق. المصنف ٧/ ٤١٣.(١٩) في ب زيادة: "إلا".

PreviousVolume 12 · Page 526Next
Previous12·526Next