definite article, such as 'the Creator' (al-Khaliq) and 'the Provider' (al-Raziq), that it is an oath in all cases; for these do not refer to anything other than the name of Allah. Thus, the same applies here. The third category is that which does not refer to an attribute of Allah the Almighty in its absolute sense, but refers to it by being annexed to Allah the Exalted, either in wording or intention, such as 'covenant' ('ahd), 'solemn pledge' (mithaq), 'trust' (amanah), and the like. This does not constitute an oath requiring expiation except by adding it or intending it. We will mention that later, if Allah the Almighty wills.
Section: If one says, "By the right of Allah" (wa haqq Allah), it is an oath requiring expiation. This is the view of Malik and al-Shafi'i. Abu Hanifa said: There is no expiation for it, because the 'right of Allah' is His obedience and His obligatory commands, and it is not an attribute of His. Our position is that Allah has rights that He deserves for Himself, such as subsistence (baqa'), greatness, majesty, and honor. Usage and custom have become associated with swearing by this attribute, so it refers to the attribute of Allah the Almighty, like His saying: "By the power of Allah." If one intends by that an oath by a created thing, the ruling regarding it is the same as the ruling regarding swearing by 'knowledge' and 'power', except that the possibility of it being a created thing in this wording is more apparent.
Section: If one says, "By the life of Allah" (la-'amr Allah), it is an oath requiring expiation. Abu Hanifa held this view. Al-Shafi'i said: If he intends an oath, then it is an oath, otherwise it is not. This is the choice of Abu Bakr, because it only becomes an oath by assuming a deleted predicate, as if he said, "By the life of Allah, I swear by it." Thus, it is metaphorical, and metaphorical usage does not fall under absolute usage. Our position is that he has sworn by an attribute from the attributes of the Essence of Allah, so it is an oath requiring expiation, like swearing by the 'subsistence' (baqa') of Allah the Almighty, for the meaning of that is swearing by the subsistence of Allah the Almighty and His Life. It is said that 'umr (life) and 'amr (life) are one and the same. It is also said that its meaning is "By the right of Allah." The custom of the Shari'ah and usage has been established for it; Allah the Almighty said: {By your life, indeed they were in their intoxication, wandering blindly} (16). And al-Nabigha (17) said:
No, by the life of Him whom you visited for years, And what blood of a body was shed upon the idols (18)
(16) Surah al-Hijr 72. (17) Diwan, p. 25. (18) In manuscript A: "upon the idols" (ala al-asnam). In a marginal note of manuscript B: "It is reported: 'I wiped His Ka'bah'". This is found in the Diwan.
التَّعْريفِ، كالخالقِ والرَّازِقِ، أَنَّها تكونُ يَمِينًا بكُلِّ حالٍ؛ لأنَّها لا تَنْصَرِفُ إلَّا إلى اسْمِ اللَّه، كذا هذا. الثالثُ، ما لا يَنْصَرِفُ بإطْلاقِه إلى صِفَةِ اللَّه تعالى، لكنْ يَنْصَرِفُ بإضافَتِه إلى اللَّه سُبْحانَه لَفْظًا أو نِيَّةً، كالعَهْدِ، والميثاقِ، والأمانَةِ، ونحوِه. فهذا لا يكونُ يَمِينًا مُكَفَّرَةً إلَّا بإضافَتِه أو نِيَّتِه. وسَنَذْكُرُ ذلك فيما بعدُ، إنْ شاءَ اللَّه تعالى.
فصل: وإِنْ قال: وحَقِّ اللَّه. فهى يَمِينٌ مُكَفَّرَة. وبهذا قال مالِكٌ، والشافِعِىُّ. وقال أبو حنيفةَ: لا كَفَّارَةَ لها؛ لأنَّ حَقَّ اللَّهِ طاعَتُه ومَفْرُوضاتُه، وليستْ صِفَةً له. ولَنا، أَنَّ للَّهِ حُقوقًا يَسْتَحِقُّها لِنَفْسِه؛ من البقاءِ، والعَظَمَةِ، والجَلالِ، والعِزَّةِ، وقد اقْتَرَنَ عُرْفُ الاسْتِعْمالِ بالحَلِفِ بهذه الصِّفَةِ، فتَنْصَرِفُ إلى صِفَةِ اللَّه تعالَى، كقَوْلِه: وقُدْرَةِ اللَّهِ. وإِنْ نَوَى بذلك القَسَمَ بمَخلُوقٍ، فالقَوْلُ فيه كالقَوْلِ فى الحَلِفِ بالعلْمِ والقُدْرَةِ، إلَّا أَنَّ احْتِمالَ المَخْلُوقِ بهذا اللَّفْظِ أظْهَرُ.
فصل: وإِنْ قال: لَعَمْرُ اللَّهِ. فهى يَمِينٌ مُوجِبَةٌ للكَفَّارَةِ. وبه قال أبو حنيفةَ. وقال الشافِعِىُّ: إنْ قَصَدَ الْيَمِينَ، فهى يَمِينٌ، وإلَّا فلا. وهو اخْتِيارُ أبى بكرٍ؛ لأنَّها إنَّما تكونُ يَمِينًا بتَقديرِ خَبَرٍ مَحْذُوفٍ، فكأنَّه قال: لعَمْرُ اللَّهِ ما أُقْسِمُ به. فيكونُ مَجازًا، والْمَجازُ لا ينْصَرِفُ إليه الإطْلاقُ. ولَنا، أنَّه أقسَمَ بصِفَةٍ مِن صِفَاتِ ذاتِ اللَّه، فكان يَمِينًا مُوجِبًا للكَفَّارَةِ، كالحَلِفِ ببَقاءِ اللَّهِ تعالى، فإنَّ مَعْنَى ذلك الحَلِفُ بِبَقاءِ اللَّه تعالَى وحَياتِه. ويُقال: العُمْرُ والعَمْرُ واحِدٌ. وقيل: مَعْناه وحَقِّ اللَّهِ. وقد ثَبَتَ له عرفُ الشَّرْعِ والاسْتعمالِ، قال اللَّهُ تعالى: {لَعَمْرُكَ إِنَّهُمْ لَفِى سَكْرَتِهِمْ يَعْمَهُونَ} (١٦). وقال النَّابِغَةُ (١٧):
فَلَا لعَمْرُ الَّذِى قَدْ زُرْتَه حِجَجًا ... وما أُريِقَ على الأَنْصابِ مِنْ جَسَدِ (١٨)
(١٦) سورة الحجر ٧٢.(١٧) ديوانه ٢٥.(١٨) فى أ: "على الأصنام". وفى حاشية ب: "ويروى: مسحت كعبته". وهو فى الديوان.