If anything is recovered from the remaining hundred, a portion of a sixth of the tadbir slave is emancipated, and what is recovered is divided between the son and the legatee in thirds. Once the entire amount is recovered, the son receives two-thirds of it and a third of the slave [which is the amount of his share, and the emancipation of half of him is completed in the tadbir slave, and the legatee receives a sixth of the slave and a third of the hundred], which is [the amount of his share]. If the debt is owed by an outsider, only a sixth of the tadbir slave is emancipated; because what is recovered from the estate is the slave, and a third of him is between him and the other legatee. The legatee receives a sixth of him, each son receives a sixth of him, and a third of him remains suspended. So whenever anything is recovered from the debt, an amount of a sixth of the tadbir slave is emancipated, and what is recovered is divided among the two sons and the legatee in sixths: the legatee receives a sixth of it, and they [the sons] receive five-sixths of it. Thus, each one of them receives half of the hundred and a third of it and a sixth of the slave, which is the amount of his share. The legatee receives a sixth of the two hundred and a sixth of the slave, which is the amount of his share, and half of the tadbir slave is emancipated, which is the amount of his share.

1976 - Issue: He said: (If he arranges for the tadbir of a slave before reaching puberty, his tadbir is valid if he is ten years of age or older and understands the nature of tadbir. What I have said regarding the man applies equally to the woman, if she is nine years of age or older.)

The sum of this is that the tadbir and bequest of a discerning minor (sabi mumayyiz) are valid. This is one of the two narrations from Malik and one of the two statements of al-Shafi'i. Some of his companions said: It is the more correct of his two statements. This has been narrated from Umar, Shurayh, and Abd Allah ibn Utbah. Al-Hasan and Abu Hanifah said: His tadbir is not valid, like that of the insane person. This is the second narration from Malik and the second statement of al-Shafi'i; because his manumission is not valid, therefore his tadbir is not valid, like the insane person. Our evidence is what Sa'id narrated from Hushaym, from Yahya...