ShamelaTranslate
Search
Sign in
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. Scholarly Open-Access Project.

AboutContactDonateImprintPrivacyTermsRight of WithdrawalCancel a subscription
Al-Mughni by Ibn Qudama - Edited by Al-Turki
Volume 3 · Page 303Section

Translation · EN

the first group follows the Imam after his taslim, and it is not permitted for the follower to be a follower in a rak'ah that he performs after his Imam has performed the taslim. As for caution in battle, one is capable of striking, stabbing, and inciting, as well as informing others of what one sees regarding hidden enemy movements, warning them, and informing those who are with the Imam of what occurs. This is not possible according to their view. Furthermore, the foundation of the Prayer of Fear is based on lightening the burden, as they are in a situation where there is a need for it. According to their view, the prayer becomes many times longer than it would be in a state of security, because each group needs to proceed to the place of prayer, return to face the enemy, and wait for the other group to go and return. So, assuming that there is half a mile between the two locations, each group needs to walk a mile, and wait for the other for the duration of a mile's walk while they are in the prayer. Then they need the obligation of returning to the place of prayer to complete the prayer without any need for it or any benefit related to it. If a person in a state of security required such hardship in congregational prayer, it would be dropped from him; so how can the one in fear be burdened with this, while he is in a situation where lightening the burden and kindness towards him are expected? As for separating from the Imam, it is permitted for an excuse and is inevitable according to both schools of thought, for they permitted the first group to separate from the Imam and go to face the enemy, and this is greater than what we have mentioned, for it has no parallel in the Sharia, nor is its like found in any other place.

Section: If he leads them in prayer according to the school of Abu Hanifah, it is permissible. Ahmad explicitly stated this, but he would be abandoning that which is more appropriate and better. Ibn Jarir and some of the followers of Al-Shafi'i held this view.

Section: Equality between the two groups is not required, as there is no text or analogy regarding that. It is required that the group positioned facing the enemy be those whose adequacy and vigilance can be trusted. Whenever it is feared that their condition might become compromised and their aid is needed by the other group, the Imam may proceed towards them with those who are with him, and they build upon what has passed of their prayer.

Section: If they perform the Jumu'ah (Friday) prayer as the Prayer of Fear, it is permissible, provided that each group consists of forty people.

Arabic (Source)

الطَّائِفَةَ الأُولَى مُؤْتَمَّةً بالإِمامِ بعد سَلامِه، ولا يجوزُ أن يكونَ المَأْمُومُ مَأْمُومًا في رَكْعَةٍ يَأْتِى بها بعد سَلامِ إمامِه. وأما الاحْتِياطُ لِلْحَرْبِ، فإنَّه يَتَمَكَّنُ من الضَّرْبِ والطَّعْنِ والتَّحْرِيضِ، وإعْلامِ غيرِه بما يَرَاهُ ممَّا خَفِىَ عليه من أمْرِ العَدُوِّ وتَحْذِيرِه، وإعْلامِ الذين مع الإِمامِ بما يَحْدُثُ، ولا يُمْكِنُ هذا على قَوْلِهِم، ولأنَّ مَبْنَى صلاةِ الخَوْفِ على التَّخْفِيفِ؛ لأنَّهم في مَوْضِعِ الحاجةِ إليه، وعلى قَوْلِهم تَطُولُ الصلاةُ أضْعافَ ما كانتْ حالَ الأمْنِ؛ لأنَّ كُلَّ طَائِفَةٍ تَحْتاجُ إلى مُضِيٍّ إلى مَكانِ الصلاةِ، وَرُجُوعِ إلى وِجَاه العَدُوِّ، وانْتِظَارٍ لِمُضِيِّ الطَّائِفَةِ الأُخْرَى وَرُجُوعِها، فعلى تَقْدِيرِ أن يكونَ بين المَكَانَيْنِ نِصْفُ مِيلٍ، تَحْتَاجُ كُلُّ طَائِفَةٍ إلى مَشْىِ مِيلٍ، وانْتِظارٍ لِلأُخْرَى قَدْرَ مَشْىِ مِيلٍ وهى في الصلاةِ، ثم تَحْتَاجُ إلى تَكْلِيفِ الرُّجُوعِ إلى مَوْضِعِ الصلاةِ لإِتْمامِ الصلاةِ مِن غير حاجَةٍ إليه، ولا مَصْلَحَةٍ تَتَعَلَّقُ به، فلو احْتَاجَ الآمِنُ إلى مثلِ هذه الكُلْفَةِ في الجَماعةِ لَسَقَطَتْ عنه، فكيف يُكَلَّفُ الخَائِفُ هذا وهو في مَظِنَّة التَّخْفِيفِ، والحاجَةِ إلى الرِّفْقِ به. وأمَّا مُفَارَقَةُ الإِمامِ فجائِزَةٌ لِلْعُذْرِ، ولا بُدَّ منها على القَوْلَيْنَ، فإنَّهم جَوَّزُوا لِلطَّائِفَةِ الأُولَى مُفارَقَةَ الإِمامِ والذَّهابَ إلى وَجْهِ العَدُوِّ، وهذا أَعْظَمُ مما ذَكَرْنَاهُ، فإنَّه لا نَظِيرَ له في الشَّرْعِ، ولا يُوجَدُ مِثْلُه في مَوْضِعٍ آخَرَ.

فصل: وإن صَلَّى بهم كمذهبِ أبي حنيفةَ، جَازَ. نَصَّ عليه أحمدُ. ولكن يكونُ تَارِكًا لِلأَوْلَى والأحْسَنِ. وبهذا قال ابنُ جَرِيرٍ، وبعضُ أصْحابِ الشَّافِعِيِّ.

فصل: ولا تَجِبُ التَّسْوِيَةُ بين الطَّائِفَتَيْنِ؛ لأنَّه لم يَرِدْ بذلك نَصٌّ ولا قِياسٌ. ويَجِبُ أن تكونَ الطَّائِفَةُ التي بإزَاءِ العَدُوِّ ممَّن تَحْصُلُ الثِّقَةُ بِكِفايَتِها وحِرَاسَتِها، ومتى خُشِىَ اخْتِلالُ حَالِهِم واحْتِيجَ إلى مَعُونَتِهِم بالطَّائِفَةِ الأُخْرَى، فَلِلْإِمامِ أن يَنْهَدَ إليهم بمَن معه، ويَبْنُوا على ما مَضَى مِن صلاتِهِم.

فصل: فإن صَلَّوْا الجُمُعَةَ صلاةَ الخَوْفِ جَازَ، إذا كانت كُلُّ طَائِفَةٍ أرْبَعِينَ.

PreviousVolume 3 · Page 303Next
Previous3·303Next