for personal use, the year is calculated from the time he possessed it if it was a threshold; because he bought it with something upon which there is no Zakat, so it is not possible to link the year to it. If he bought it with a threshold of grazing livestock, he does not link it to its year, because they are different. If he bought it with less than a threshold of currencies, or of trade goods, the year is calculated from the time its value becomes a threshold; because the passing of a year over a complete threshold is a condition for the obligation of Zakat.
Section: If one buys a threshold of grazing livestock for trade, and a year passes while both grazing (sawn) and the intention of trade are present, he pays Zakat on it as trade wealth. This is the opinion of Abu Hanifa and al-Thawri. Malik and al-Shafi'i (in his later opinion) said: He pays Zakat on it as grazing livestock, because it is stronger, due to the consensus on it and its being specific to the substance (of the animal), thus it takes precedence. Our argument is that Zakat on trade is more beneficial to the poor, because it is obligatory on the excess (value) calculated, and because the reason for the obligation of Zakat on the amount exceeding the threshold has occurred, so it is obligatory just as if it had not reached a threshold by grazing (9). If the time for the obligation of Zakat on grazing livestock precedes the time for the obligation of Zakat on trade, such as if he owns forty sheep whose value is less than two hundred dirhams, the Qadi said: The obligation of Zakat is delayed until the year of the trade is completed, because that is more beneficial to the poor, and this delay (10) does not lead to its lapse; because Zakat becomes obligatory on it when the trade year is completed. It is possible that Zakat on the substance becomes obligatory when its year is completed, due to the existence of its requirement without any conflict. When the trade year is completed, the Zakat on the amount exceeding the threshold becomes obligatory due to the existence of its requirement, because this is trade wealth, a year has passed over it, and it is a threshold. It is not possible to require both Zakat payments in their entirety, because it would lead to requiring two Zakat payments in one year for one reason, which is not permitted, according to the statement of the Prophet - may Allah bless him and grant him peace -: "There is no duplication (11) in
(9) In the original manuscript: "al-sawm". (10) In M: "wa-illa". (11) In M: "tuthna" (is duplicated), which is an error. Al-thana' means a matter that is repeated twice and to do something twice.
بعَرْضِ القُنْيَةِ، انْعَقَدَ عليه الحَوْلُ من حِينَ مَلَكَه إن كان نِصابًا؛ لأنَّه اشْتَرَاهُ بما لا زَكَاةَ فيه، فلم يُمْكِنْ بِناءُ الحَوْلِ عليه. وإن اشْتَرَاهُ بِنِصابٍ من السَّائِمَةِ، لم يَبْنِ على حَوْلِه؛ لأنَّهما مُخْتَلِفانِ. وإن اشْتَرَاهُ بما دُونَ النِّصابِ من الأثْمانِ، أو من عُرُوضِ التِّجارَةِ، انْعَقَدَ عليه الحَوْلُ من حِينِ تَصِيرُ قِيمَتُه نِصابًا؛ لأنَّ مُضِىَّ الحَوْلِ على نِصابٍ كامِلٍ شَرْطٌ لِوُجُوبِ الزكاةِ.
فصل: وإذا اشْتَرَى لِلتِّجَارَةِ نِصابًا من السَّائِمَةِ، فحالَ الحَوْلُ، والسَّوْمُ ونِيَّةُ التِّجارَةِ مَوْجُودَانِ، زَكَّاهُ زَكَاةَ التِّجَارَةِ. وبهذا قال أبو حنيفةَ، والثَّوْرِىُّ. وقال مَالِكٌ، والشَّافِعِىُّ فى الجَدِيدِ: يُزَكِّيها زَكَاةَ السَّوْمِ؛ لأنَّها أقْوَى، لانْعِقادِ الإِجْماعِ عليها، واخْتِصاصِها بالعَيْنِ، فكانَتْ أوْلَى. ولَنا، أنَّ زَكَاةَ التِّجارَةِ أحَظُّ لِلْمَسَاكِينِ؛ لأنَّها تَجِبُ فيما زادَ بالحِسابِ، ولأنَّ الزَّائِدَ عن النِّصابِ قد وُجِدَ سَبَبُ وُجُوبِ زَكَاتِه، فيَجِبُ كما لو لم يَبْلُغْ بالسَّوْمِ (٩) نِصابًا، وإن سَبَقَ وَقْتُ وُجُوبِ زَكَاةِ السَّوْمِ وَقْتَ وُجُوبِ زَكاةِ التِّجَارَةِ، مثل أن يَمْلكَ أرْبَعِينَ من الغَنَمِ قِيمَتُها دُونَ مائتَىْ دِرْهَمٍ، فقال القاضى: يتَأخَّرُ وُجُوبُ الزكاةِ حتى يَتِمَّ حَوْلُ التِّجارَةِ؛ لأنَّه أنْفَعُ لِلْفُقَراءِ، ولا (١٠) يُفْضِى التَّأْخِيرُ إلى سُقُوطِها؛ لأنَّ الزكاةَ تَجِبُ فيها إذا تَمَّ حَوْلُ التِّجَارَةِ. ويَحْتَمِلُ أن تَجِبَ زَكَاةُ العَيْنِ عندَ تَمَامِ حَوْلِها؛ لِوُجُودِ مُقْتَضِيها من غيرِ مُعَارِضٍ. فإذا تَمَّ حَوْلُ التِّجارَةِ، وَجَبَتْ زَكَاةُ الزَّائِدِ عن النِّصَابِ؛ لِوُجُودِ مُقْتَضِيها، لأنَّ هذا مَالٌ لِلتِّجارَةِ، حالَ الحَوْلُ عليه وهو نِصَابٌ، ولا يُمْكِنُ إيجابُ الزَّكَاتَيْنِ بِكَمَالِهما؛ لأنَّه يُفْضِى إلى إيجابِ زَكاتَيْنِ فى حَوْلٍ وَاحِدٍ، بِسَبَبٍ وَاحِدٍ، فلم يَجُزْ ذلك؛ لِقَوْلِ النَّبِىِّ -صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ-: "لا ثِنَى (١١) في
(٩) فى الأصل: "السوم".(١٠) فى م: "وإلا".(١١) فى م: "تثنى" خطأ. والثنى: الأمر يعاد مرتين وأن يفعل الشىء مرتين.