after sunset, it does not become binding upon him. If he was indigent at the time of the obligation, then became affluent during that night or that day, nothing is due upon him. If he was affluent at the time of the obligation, then became indigent, it does not lapse from him, due to consideration of the state at the time of the obligation. Whoever dies after the sunset of the night of Fitr, the charity of Fitr is due from him. Ahmad stated this explicitly. Regarding what we have mentioned about the time of the obligation, this is the view of al-Thawri, Ishaq, Malik in one of the two narrations from him, and al-Shafi'i in one of his two opinions. Al-Layth, Abu Thawr, and the People of Opinion said: It becomes obligatory at the break of dawn on the day of Eid. This is also a narration from Malik, because it is an act of devotion related to the Eid, so its time does not precede the day of Eid, like the Udhiyah (sacrificial animal). Our argument is the statement of Ibn Abbas: "The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) made Zakat al-Fitr obligatory as a purification for the fasting person from idle talk and obscenity." Furthermore, it is attributed to the breaking of the fast (al-fitr), so it becomes obligatory because of it, like Zakat on wealth; this is because attribution is evidence of specification, and the cause is more specific to its ruling than anything else. The Udhiyah does not relate to the break of dawn, nor is it obligatory, and it does not resemble that which we are discussing. Based on this, if the sun sets while a slave is sold within the option period, or a slave is gifted to him and he accepts but has not taken possession, or he buys him but has not taken possession, then the Fitra is upon the buyer or the recipient; because ownership belongs to him, and the Fitra is upon the owner. If a slave is bequeathed to him, and the testator dies before sunset, and the legatee does not accept until after the sun has set, then the Fitra is upon him according to one of the two views. The other view is that it is upon the heirs of the testator, based on the two views regarding the bequeathed item: does ownership transfer upon death or from the time of acceptance? If the legatee dies before rejecting and before accepting, and his heirs accept, and we say their acceptance is valid, is his Fitra upon the heirs of the testator or from the estate of the legatee?
(7) In M: "its obligation". (8) In M, there is an addition: "and it is a narration from Malik" (repetition). (9) Its chain of narration was mentioned previously on page 284. (10) In M: "related to it". (11) In A and M: "it set". (12) From here until his saying: "and before the acceptance" which follows, it is omitted from A and M.
بعدَ الغُرُوبِ، لم تَلْزَمْهُ. ولو كان حِينَ الوُجُوبِ مُعْسِرًا، ثم أيْسَرَ فى لَيْلَتِه تِلْكَ أو فى يَوْمِه، لم يَجِبْ عليه شىءٌ. ولو كان فى وَقْتِ الوُجُوبِ مُوسِرًا، ثم أعْسَرَ، لم تَسْقُطُ عنه اعْتِبَارًا بحالةِ الوُجُوبِ. ومن ماتَ بعد غُرُوبِ الشَّمْسِ لَيْلَةَ الفِطْرِ، فعليه صَدَقَةُ الفِطْرِ. نَصَّ عليه أحمدُ. وبما ذَكَرْنا فى وَقْتِ الوُجُوبِ قال الثَّوْرِىُّ، وإسحاقُ، ومالِكٌ، فى إحْدَى الرِّوَايَتَيْنِ عنه، والشَّافِعِىُّ، فى أحَدِ قَوْلَيْهِ. وقال اللَّيْثُ، وأبو ثَوْرٍ، وأصْحابُ الرَّأْىِ: تَجِبُ بِطُلُوعِ الفَجْرِ يَوْمَ العِيدِ. وهو رِوَايةٌ عن مالِكٍ؛ لأنَّها قُرْبَةٌ تَتَعَلَّقُ بالعِيدِ، فلمْ يَتَقَدَّمْ وَقْتُها (٧) يَوْمَ العِيدِ (٨)، كالأُضْحِيَةِ. ولَنا، قولُ ابنِ عَبَّاسٍ: أنَّ النَّبِىَّ -صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ- فَرَضَ زَكَاةَ الفِطْرِ طُهْرَةً لِلصَّائِمِ من اللَّغْوِ والرَّفَثِ (٩). ولأنَّها تُضافُ إلى الفِطْرِ، فكانت وَاجِبَةً به، كزَكاةِ المالِ، وذلك لأنَّ الإِضافَةَ دَلِيلُ الاخْتِصَاصِ، والسَّبَبُ أخَصُّ بِحُكْمِه من غيرِه، والأُضْحِيَةُ لا تَتَعَلَّقُ (١٠) بِطُلُوعِ الفَجْرِ، ولا هى واجِبَةٌ، ولا تُشْبِهُ ما نحنُ فيه. فعلَى هذا إذا غَرَبَتِ الشَّمْسُ، والعَبْدُ المَبِيعُ فى مُدَّةِ الخِيَارِ، أو وُهِبَ له عَبْدٌ فَقَبِلَهُ ولم يَقْبِضْهُ، أو اشْتراهُ ولم يَقْبِضْه، فالفِطْرَةُ على المُشْتَرِى والمُتَّهِبِ؛ لأنَّ المِلْكَ له، والفِطْرَةُ على المالِكِ. ولو أوْصَى له بِعَبْدٍ، ومَاتَ المُوصِى قبل غُرُوبِ الشَّمْسِ، فلم يَقْبَل المُوصَى له حتى غَرَبَتْ (١١)، فالفِطْرَةُ عليه، فى أحَدِ الوَجْهَيْنِ، والآخَرِ على وَرَثَةِ المُوصِى، بنَاءً على الوَجْهَيْنِ فى المُوصَى به هل يَنْتَقِلُ بالمَوْتِ أو من حِين القَبُولِ؟ ولو ماتَ (١٢) المُوصَى له قبلَ الرَّدِّ وقبلَ القَبُولِ، فقَبِلَ ورثتُه، وقُلْنا بصِحَّةِ قَبُولِهم، فهل تكونُ فطْرتُه على وَرَثَةِ المُوصِى، أو فى تَرِكةِ المُوصَى له؟
(٧) فى م: "وجوبها".(٨) فى م زيادة: "وهو رواية عن مالك" تكرار.(٩) تقدم تخريجه فى صفحة ٢٨٤.(١٠) فى م: "تعلق لها".(١١) فى أ، م: "غابت".(١٢) من هنا إلى قوله: "وقبل القبول" الآتى، سقط من: أ، م.