the Hajj. This is the opinion of Ibn 'Abbas, 'Ikrimah, 'Ata', al-Sha'bi, Rabi'ah, Malik, al-Shafi'i, Ishaq, and the People of Opinion (Ashab al-Ra'y). Al-Nakha'i, al-Zuhri, and Hammad said: He is liable to perform Hajj the following year, because the intercourse coincided with a state of ihram for Hajj, thereby corrupting it, just like intercourse before the pelting. Our evidence is the saying of the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him: "Whoever witnesses this prayer of ours, and stands with us until we depart, [and has] (2) previously stood at 'Arafat, either by night or by day, then his Hajj is complete and he has fulfilled his rites" (3). Furthermore, it is the opinion of Ibn 'Abbas, for he said regarding a man who had intercourse with his wife before he performed the circumambulation of the visit (ifadah) (4) on the Day of Sacrifice: "They shall slaughter a camel between them, and he is not liable for Hajj the following year." We do not know of any Companion who opposed him in this. Also, Hajj is an act of worship that has two stages of releasing from ihram (tahallul), so the existence of a corrupting factor after its first release does not corrupt it, just as it does not after the first taslimah in prayer; by this, it is distinguished from what occurs before the first release from ihram.
The second section is that what is incumbent upon him due to the intercourse is a sheep. This is the apparent meaning of the words of al-Khiraqi, and it was explicitly stated by Ahmad. [This is the opinion of] (5) 'Ikrimah, Rabi'ah, Malik, and Ishaq. The Qadi said: There is another narration that he is liable for a camel. This is the opinion of Ibn 'Abbas, 'Ata', al-Sha'bi, al-Shafi'i, and the People of Opinion, because he had intercourse during Hajj, so a camel became incumbent upon him, as it would be before the pelting of the Jamrat al-'Aqabah. Our argument is that it is an act of intercourse that did not corrupt the Hajj (6), so it does not necessitate a camel, like intercourse without penetration when there is no ejaculation. Moreover, the ruling of ihram was lightened by the first release from ihram, so it is appropriate that what it necessitates be less than that necessitated by the full state of ihram.
The third section is that the ihram is corrupted by intercourse after the pelting of the Jamrah, and it is incumbent upon him to enter ihram from the Hill (the area outside the Sacred Precincts). This is what 'Ikrimah, Rabi'ah, and Ishaq said. Ibn 'Abbas, 'Ata', al-Sha'bi, and al-Shafi'i said: His Hajj is
(2) In the original: "and had". (3) Its verification has preceded on page 273. (4) Omitted from: A. (5) In B and M: "and the opinion of". (6) Omitted from: B and M.
الحَجَّ. وهو قولُ ابنِ عَبّاسٍ، وعِكْرِمَةَ، وعَطاءٍ، والشَّعْبِىِّ، ورَبِيعَةَ، ومالِكٍ، والشَّافِعِىِّ، وإسحاقَ، وأصْحابِ الرَّأْىِ. وقال النَّخَعِىُّ، والزُّهْرىُّ، وحَمَّادٌ: عليه حَجٌّ من قابِلٍ؛ لأنَّ الوَطْءَ صادَفَ إحْرَامًا من الحَجِّ، فأفْسَدَهُ، كَالوَطْءِ قبلَ الرَّمْىِ. ولَنا، قولُ النَّبِىِّ -صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ-: "مَنْ شَهِدَ صَلَاتَنا هذِهِ، وَوَقَفَ مَعَنَا حَتَّى نَدْفَعَ، [وقَدْ] (٢) وَقَفَ بِعَرَفَةَ قَبْلَ ذلِكَ لَيْلًا أو نَهَارًا، فَقَدْ تَمَّ حَجُّهُ، وقَضَى تَفَثَهُ" (٣). ولأنَّه قولُ ابنِ عَبّاسٍ، فإنَّه قال فى رَجُلٍ أصابَ أهْلَه قبلَ أن يُفِيضَ (٤) يومَ النَّحْرِ: يَنْحَرانِ جَزُورًا بينهما، وليس عليه الحَجُّ من قَابِلٍ. ولا نَعْرِفُ له مُخَالِفًا فى الصَّحابةِ. ولأنَّ الحَجَّ عِبادَةٌ لها تَحَلُّلَانِ، فوُجُودُ المُفْسِدِ بعدَ تَحَلُّلِها الأوَّلِ لا يُفْسِدُها، كبعدِ التَّسْلِيمَةِ الأُولَى فى الصلاة، وبهذا فَارَقَ ما قبلَ التَّحَلُّلِ الأوَّلِ. الفصل الثانى، أنَّ الوَاجِبَ عليه بِالوَطْءِ شَاةٌ. هذا ظَاهِرُ كلامِ الخِرَقِىِّ. ونَصَّ عليه أحمدُ. [وهو قَوْلُ] (٥) عِكْرِمَةَ، وَرَبِيَعةَ، ومَالِكٍ، وإسحَاقَ. وقال القاضى: فيه رِوَايَةٌ أُخْرَى، أنَّ عليه بَدَنَةً. وهو قولُ ابنِ عَبّاسٍ، وعَطاءٍ، والشَّعْبِىِّ، والشَّافِعِىِّ، وأصْحابِ الرَّأْىِ؛ لأنَّه وَطِئَ فى الحَجِّ، فوَجَبَتْ عليه بَدَنَةٌ، كما قبلَ رَمْىِ جَمْرَةِ العَقَبَةِ. ولَنا، أنَّه وَطْءٌ لم يُفْسِدِ الحَجَّ (٦)، فلم يُوجبِ البَدَنَةَ (٦)، كَالوَطْءِ دونَ الفَرْجِ إذا لم يُنْزِلْ. ولأنَّ حُكْمَ الإِحْرامِ خَفَّ بالتَّحَلُّلِ الأوَّلِ، فيَنْبَغِى أن يكونَ مُوجِبُه دونَ مُوجِبِ الإِحْرامِ التّامِّ. الفصل الثالث، أنَّه يَفْسُدُ الإِحْرامُ بِالْوَطْءِ بعدَ رَمْىِ الجَمْرَةِ، ويَلْزَمُه أن يُحْرِمَ من الحِلِّ. وبذلك قال عِكْرِمَةُ، ورَبِيعَةُ، وإسحاقُ. وقال ابنُ عَبّاسٍ، وعَطاءٌ، والشَّعْبِىُّ، والشَّافِعِىُّ: حَجُّهُ
(٢) فى الأصل: "وكان قد".(٣) تقدم تخريجه فى صفحة ٢٧٣.(٤) سقط من: أ.(٥) فى ب، م: "وقول".(٦) سقط من: ب، م.