every parent and their child. Thus, when one dies and leaves a child, his share transfers to his child, whether anyone from the first generation remains or not.
Section: If he arranges some of them and not others, and says: 'I have made this endowment upon my children, and the children of my children, then upon their children,' or 'upon my children, then upon the children of my children and their children, as long as they reproduce and succeed one another,' or says: 'upon my children and the children of my children, then upon their children and the children of their children, as long as they reproduce,' then it is according to what he said. Those whom he combined using the 'wa' (and) which necessitates combining and participation shall participate, and those he arranged using a letter of ordering shall be arranged. In the first case, the child and the child of the child participate, then when they become extinct, it passes to those who come after them. In the second case, it is exclusive to the child, then when they become extinct, it becomes shared among those who come after them. In the third case, the first two generations participate in it to the exclusion of others, then when they become extinct, those who come after them participate in it.
Section: If he says: 'I have made this endowment upon my children, then upon the children of my children, on the condition that whoever among my children dies and leaves a child, his share is for his child,' or 'his share is for his siblings,' or 'for his child's child,' or 'for his brother's child,' or 'for his sisters,' or 'for his sisters' children,' then it is according to what he stipulated. If he says: 'Whoever among them dies and leaves a child, his share is for his child, and whoever among them dies without leaving a child, his share is for the people of the endowment.' If he had three sons, and one of them died leaving two sons, his share transferred to them. Then the second died without leaving a child, so his share is for his brother and his brother's two sons equally, because they are the people of the endowment. Then if one of the son's two sons died without leaving a child, his share transferred to his brother and his paternal uncle, because they are the people of the endowment. And if one of the three sons died without leaving a child, and left behind his two brothers and his brother's two sons, then his share is for his two brothers
(6) In (M): "child". (7) In (M): "and order". (8) Omitted from the original. Note for review. (9) Following this in (M), the following was repeated: "for the people of the endowment. And if he had three sons, and one of them died leaving two sons, his share transferred to them. Then the second died without leaving a child, so his share"—the preceding text. (10) In the original: "his siblings and the sons of". (11) In the original: "for his siblings".
