half of the bequest, regardless of whether he knew of the deceased person’s death or was ignorant of it. This is the opinion of Abu Hanifah, Ishaq, and the Basrans. Al-Thawri, Abu Yusuf, and Muhammad said: If he says, "This hundred is for so-and-so and so-and-so," it belongs to the living one among them. If he says, "Between so-and-so and so-and-so," the Thawri agrees with us that half of it belongs to the living one. From al-Shafi'i, there are two opinions similar to these. Abu al-Khattab said: In my view, if he knows he is dead, the entire amount belongs to the living one; if he does not know he is dead, the living one receives half. It has been narrated from Ahmad that which indicates this opinion, for he said, in the report of Ibn al-Qasim: If he bequeaths one hundred to so-and-so and so-and-so, and one of them turns out to be dead, the living one receives fifty. It was said to him: Is it not the case that if he says, "My third is for so-and-so and for the wall," the entire third is for so-and-so? He replied: And what is similar to this? The wall has no ownership! Thus, whenever he joins one for whom a bequest is valid with one for whom it is not—such as bequeathing to so-and-so, or to the King, or to a wall, or to a deceased person—the entire bequest goes to the one for whom the bequest is valid, provided he is aware of the situation. This is because if he joins them in such a state, it is known that he intended the entire bequest for the one for whom the bequest is valid. But if he is unaware of the situation, the one for whom the bequest is valid receives half, because he intended to deliver half of it to him and the other half to the other, under the assumption that the bequest to him was valid; so when the bequest becomes void regarding one of them, it becomes valid regarding the other in proportion, similar to the splitting of a transaction (tafriq al-safqa). The reasoning for the first opinion is that he made the bequest to two people, so neither of them is entitled to the whole of it, just as if they were both people for whom a bequest is valid and one of them died, or as if he were unaware of the situation. As for if he bequeaths to two living people, and one of them dies, the other receives half of the bequest. We know of no disagreement regarding this. Likewise, if the bequest becomes void regarding one of them due to his rejection of it or because he falls outside those eligible for it. If he said: "I have bequeathed"
(2) Omitted from M. (3) In M: "when". (4) In M: "and to the King". (5) Omitted from the original.
نِصْفُ الوَصِيَّةِ، سواءٌ عَلِمَ مَوْتَ المَيِّتِ أو جَهِلَه. وهذا قولُ أبى حنيفةَ، وإسحاقَ، والبَصْرِيِّينَ. وقال الثَّوْرِىُّ، وأبو يوسفَ، ومحمدٌ: إذا قال: هذه المائةُ لِفُلانٍ وفُلانٍ. فهى لِلْحَىِّ منهما. وإن قال: بين فُلانٍ وفُلانٍ. فوَافَقنَا الثَّوْرِىُّ في أن نِصْفَها لِلْحَىِّ. وعن الشافِعِىِّ كالمَذهَبَيْنِ. وقال أبو الخَطَّابِ: عِنْدِى أنَّه إذا عَلِمَه مَيِّتًا، فالجَمِيعُ لِلْحَىِّ، وإن لم يَعْلَمْه مَيِّتًا، فلِلْحَىِّ النِّصْفُ. وقد نُقِلَ عن أحمدَ ما يَدُلُّ على هذا القَوْلِ. فإنَّه (٢) قال، في رِوَايةِ ابنِ القاسِمِ: إذا أَوْصَى لِفُلانٍ وفُلانٍ بمائةٍ، فبَانَ أحَدُهُما مَيِّتًا، فلِلْحَىِّ خَمْسُونَ. فقِيلَ له: أليس إذا قال: ثُلُثِى لِفُلانٍ وللحائِطِ، أنَّ الثُّلُثَ كلَّه لِفُلانٍ؟ فقال: وأىُّ شيءٍ يُشْبِه هذا، الحائِطُ له مِلْكٌ! فعلى هذا متى (٣) شَرَّكَ بين من تَصِحُّ الوَصِيّةُ له ومَن لا تَصِحُّ، مثل أن يُوصِىَ لِفُلانٍ أو لِلملكِ (٤) ولِلْحائِط، أو لِفْلانٍ المَيِّتِ، فالمُوصَى به كلُّه لمن تَصِحُّ الوَصِيّةُ له، إذا كان عالِمًا بالحالِ؛ لأنّه إذا شَرَّكَ بينهما في هذه الحالِ، عُلِمَ أنَّه قَصَدَ بالوَصِيَّةِ كلِّها مَنْ تَصِحُّ الوَصِيَّةُ له. وإن لم يَعْلَم الحالَ، فلمَن تَصِحُّ الوَصِيّةُ له نِصْفُها؛ لأنَّه قَصَدَ إيصالَ نِصْفِها إليه، وإلى الآخَرِ النِّصْفِ الآخَر (٥)، ظَنًّا منه أنَّ الوَصِيّةَ له صَحِيحَةٌ، فإذا بَطَلَتِ الوَصِيّةُ في حَقِّ أحَدِهِما، صَحَّتْ في حَقِّ الآخَر بِقِسْطِه، كتَفْرِيقِ الصَّفْقةِ. ووَجْهُ القولِ الأَوَّلِ، أنَّه جَعَلَ الوَصِيّةَ لِاثْنَيْنِ، فلم يَسْتَحِقَّ أحَدُهُما جَمِيعَها، كما لو كانا ممَّن تَصِحُّ الوَصِيّةُ لهما فماتَ أحَدُهُما، أو كما لو لم يَعْلَمْ الحالَ. فأمَّا إن وَصَّى لِاثْنَيْنِ حَيَّيْنِ، فماتَ أحَدُهُما، فللآخَر نِصْفُ الوَصِيَّةِ. لا نَعْلَمُ في هذا خِلَافًا. وكذلك لو بَطَلَتِ الوَصِيّةُ في حَقِّ أحَدِهِما؛ لِرَدِّه لها، أو لِخُرُوجِه عن أن يكونَ من أهْلِها. ولو قال: أوْصَيْتُ
(٢) سقط من: م.(٣) في م: "إذا".(٤) في م: "وللملك".(٥) سقط من: الأصل.