that is a possession of his; because uncertainty and risk do not prevent the validity of a bequest, so it follows the same ruling as the emancipation of a fetus. If it is delivered dead, the bequest is void; if it is delivered alive, and we know of its existence at the time of the bequest, or we judge that it existed, then the bequest is valid. If it were not so, it would not be valid, due to the possibility that it came into being later. If he says: "I have bequeathed to you what this slave-girl of mine carries, or this she-camel of mine, or this palm tree of mine," it is permissible due to what we have mentioned regarding its validity despite the uncertainty. As for the bequest to a fetus, it is also valid; we know of no disagreement regarding this, and this was stated by Al-Thawri, Al-Shafi'i, Ishaq, Abu Thawr, and the People of Opinion (Ashab al-Ra'y). This is because a bequest follows the same course as inheritance, in terms of it being the transfer of wealth from a person after his death to the legatee without compensation, just as its transfer to his heir. Allah the Exalted has termed inheritance a bequest in His saying, Glorified be He: {Allah instructs you concerning your children: for the male, what is equal to the share of two females} (1). And He, Glorified be He, said: {If there are more than that, they are partners in a third, after any bequest which was made or debt, without causing harm. An instruction from Allah} (2). The fetus inherits, so the bequest to it is valid. Furthermore, the bequest is broader than inheritance, for it is valid for one who differs in religion and for a slave, unlike inheritance. If the fetus inherits, then a bequest to it is more appropriate. Also, a bequest relates to risk and uncertainty, so it is valid for the fetus, like emancipation. If the fetus is delivered dead, the bequest is void, because it does not inherit, and because it is possible that it was not alive at the time of the bequest, so neither the bequest nor the inheritance is established for it due to doubt. It makes no difference whether it died due to an external cause, from a blow to the abdomen, or from drinking (3) medicine, or otherwise; for the reason we explained that it does not inherit. If she delivers it alive, the bequest to it is valid, provided we judge its existence at the time of the bequest. Al-Khiraqi reported that this applies if she gives birth to it in less than six months. This is not a condition in every case, but if the woman is a marital bed (firaash) for a husband or a master who has intercourse with her, and she gives birth to it in six months or less, we know of its existence at the time of the bequest. If she gives birth to it after that period, the bequest to it is not valid;
(1) Surah An-Nisa: 11. (2) Surah An-Nisa: 12. (3) In M: "darb" (hitting).
مَمْلُوكةٍ له؛ لأنَّ الغَرَرَ والخَطَرَ لا يَمْنَعُ صِحّةَ الوَصِيَّةِ، فجَرَى مَجْرَى إعْتاقِ الحَمْلِ، فإن انْفَصَلَ مَيِّتًا، بَطَلَتِ الوَصِيَّةُ، وإن انْفَصَلَ حَيًّا، وعَلِمنا وُجُودَه حالَ الوَصِيَّةِ، أو حَكَمْنا بوُجُودِه، صَحَّتِ الوَصِيّةُ، وإن لم يكُنْ كذلك، لم تَصِحَّ؛ لِجَوازِ حُدُوثِه. ولو قال: أَوْصَيْتُ لك بما تَحْمِلُ جارِيَتِى هذه، أو ناقَتِى هذه، أو نَخْلَتِى هذه. جَازَ؛ لما ذَكَرْنا من صِحَّتِها مع الغَرَرِ. وأَمَّا الوَصِيَّةُ لِلْحَمْلِ، فصَحِيحةٌ أيضًا، لا نَعْلَمُ فيه خِلَافًا، وبذلك قال الثَّوْريُّ، والشافِعِيُّ، وإسحاقُ، وأبو ثَوْرٍ، وأصْحابُ الرأى؛ وذلك لأنَّ الوَصِيّةَ جَرَتْ مَجْرَى المِيرَاثِ، من حيثُ كَوْنُها انْتِقالَ المالِ من الإِنْسانِ بعد مَوْتِه، إلى المُوصَى له، بغيرِ عِوَضٍ، كانْتِقالِه إلى وارِثِه، وقد سَمَّى اللهُ تعالى المِيرَاثَ وَصِيَّةً، بقولِه سُبْحانَه: {يُوصِيكُمُ اللَّهُ فِي أَوْلَادِكُمْ لِلذَّكَرِ مِثْلُ حَظِّ الْأُنْثَيَيْنِ} (١). وقال سُبْحانَه: {فَإِنْ كَانُوا أَكْثَرَ مِنْ ذَلِكَ فَهُمْ شُرَكَاءُ فِي الثُّلُثِ مِنْ بَعْدِ وَصِيَّةٍ يُوصَى بِهَا أَوْ دَيْنٍ غَيْرَ مُضَارٍّ وَصِيَّةً مِنَ اللَّهِ} (٢). والحَمْلُ يَرِثُ، فتَصِحُّ الوَصِيَّةُ له، ولأنَّ الوَصِيَّةُ أوْسَعُ من المِيرَاثِ، فإنَّها تَصِحُّ لِلْمُخالِفِ في الدِّينِ والعَبْدِ، بخِلَافِ المِيرَاثِ، فإذا وَرِثَ الحَمْلُ، فالوَصِيَّةُ له أَوْلَى، ولأنَّ الوَصِيَّةَ تَتَعلَّقُ بخَطَرٍ وغَرَرٍ، فتَصِحُّ لِلْحَمْلِ، كالعِتْقِ. فإن انْفَصَلَ الْحَمْلُ مَيِّتًا، بَطَلَتِ الوَصِيَّةُ؛ لأنَّه لا يَرِثُ، ولأنَّه يَحْتَمِلُ أن لا يكُونَ حَيًّا حينَ الوَصِيَّةِ، فلا تَثْبُتُ له الوَصِيَّةُ والمِيرَاثُ بالشَّكِّ. وسواءٌ ماتَ لِعَارِضٍ، من ضَرْبِ البَطْنِ، أو شُرْبِ (٣) دَواءٍ، أو غيرِهِ؛ لما بَيَّنَّا من أنَّه لا يَرِثُ. وإن وَضَعَتْهُ حَيًّا، صَحَّتِ الوَصِيَّةُ له، إذا حَكَمْنا بوُجُودِه حالَ الوَصِيَّةِ. نَقَلَ الخِرَقِىُّ، إذا أَتَتْ به لأَقَلَّ من سِتَّةِ أَشْهُرٍ. وليس ذلك شَرْطًا في كلِّ حالٍ، لكنْ إن كانت المرْأَةُ فِرَاشًا لِزَوْجٍ أو سَيِّدٍ يَطَؤُها، فأتَتْ به لِسِتَّةِ أشْهُرٍ فما دون، عَلِمْنا وُجُودَه حينَ الوَصِيَّةِ، وإن أَتَتْ به لأَكْثَرَ منها، لم تَصِحَّ الوَصِيَّةُ له؛
(١) سورة النساء ١١.(٢) سورة النساء ١٢.(٣) في م: "ضرب".