ShamelaTranslate
Search
Sign in
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. Scholarly Open-Access Project.

AboutContactDonateImprintPrivacyTermsRight of WithdrawalCancel a subscription
Al-Mughni by Ibn Qudama - Edited by Al-Turki
Volume 9 · Page 3911117 - Issue: He said: (The match [kafa'a] is one who possesses religion and status)

Translation · EN

1117 - Issue: He said: (The compatible person is one who possesses religion (1) and status.)

By status (mansib), he means lineage (hasab), which is ancestry (nasab). There is a difference in narration from Ahmad regarding the conditions of compatibility. According to one, there are only two conditions: religion and status, [and nothing else]. (2) According to another, there are five: these two, in addition to being free, the craft/profession, and wealth. Al-Qadi mentioned in "Al-Mujarrad" that the absence of these three does not invalidate the marriage, according to a single narration, and that the two narrations pertain only to the first two conditions. He said: It is reasonable that what invalidates it is the lack of compatibility in lineage and nothing else; because it is a permanent deficiency, whereas the others are not permanent and their deficiency does not extend to the offspring. He mentioned the two narrations regarding all conditions in "Al-Jami'". Abu al-Khattab also mentioned it. Malik said: Compatibility is only in religion. Ibn 'Abd al-Barr said: This is the general view of the school of Malik and his companions. There is a narration from al-Shafi'i similar to the statement of Malik, and another statement that it consists of the five we mentioned, plus being free from the four defects, making it six. Such is also the statement of Abu Hanifa, al-Thawri, and al-Hasan ibn Hayy, except regarding the profession and being free from the four defects. (3) Muhammad ibn al-Hasan did not consider religion [as a condition], unless he is someone who drinks intoxicants, goes out, and is mocked (4) by children, in which case he is not compatible; for the common behavior among the soldiers is licentiousness (fisq), and that is not considered (5) a deficiency. The evidence for considering religion is His saying, the Almighty: {Is he who is a believer like him who is a transgressor? They are not equal.} (6) Also, because the transgressor is despised, his testimony and transmission are rejected, he is not trusted with person or property, he is stripped of authority (7), deficient before Allah the Almighty and His creation, and has little share in (8) the world and the Hereafter, so it is not permissible for him to be a compatible match for a chaste woman, nor equal to her; rather, he is a compatible match for his own kind. As for the transgressor among the soldiers, he is...

Notes

(1) In M: "and religion (al-din)". (2) Omitted from: M. (3) Omitted from: the original, A. (4) In M: "with him". (5) In B and M: "and it is considered". (6) Surah al-Sajdah 18. (7) In M: "authority (al-wilayah)". (8) In B: "of/from (min)".

Arabic (Source)

١١١٧ - مسألة؛ قال: (والكُفءُ ذُو الدِّين (١) والمَنْصِبِ)

يعنى بالمَنْصِبِ الحَسَبَ، وهو النَّسَبُ. واختلفتِ الرِّوايةُ عن أحمدَ، فى شُروطِ الكفاءةِ، فعنه هما شَرْطانِ؛ الدِّينُ، والمَنْصِبُ، [لا غيرُ] (٢). وعنه، أنَّها خَمسةٌ؛ هذان، والحُرِّيَّةُ، والصِّناعةُ، واليَسَارُ. وذكر القاضى، فى "المُجَرَّدِ" أنَّ فَقْدَ هذه الثلاثة لا يُبْطِلُ النِّكاحَ، رِوايةً واحدةً، وإنَّما الرِّوايتان فى الشرطينِ الأولينِ. قال: ويتَوَجَّهُ أن المُبْطِلَ عَدَمُ الكفاءةِ فى النسَبِ لا غيرُ؛ لأنَّه نَقْصٌ لازمٌ، وما عَدَاه غيرُ لازمٍ، ولا يَتَعَدَّى نَقْصُه إلى الوَلَدِ. وذَكَر فى "الجامع" الرِّوايتَيْنِ فى جميعِ الشُّروطِ. وذكره أبو الخَطَابِ أيضًا. وقال مالكٌ: الكفاءةُ فى الدِّينِ لا غيرُ. قال ابنُ عبدِ البَرِّ: هذا جملةُ مذهبِ مالكٍ وأصحابِه. وعن الشافعى كقَوْلِ مالكٍ، وقول آخرُ أنَّها الخمسةُ التي ذكَرناها، والسَّلامةُ من العُيوبِ الأربعةِ فتكون سِتّةً. وكذلك قولُ أبى حنيفةَ، والثَّوْرِىِّ، والحسنِ بن حَىٍّ، إلا فى الصَّنْعةِ والسَّلامةِ من العُيوبِ الأربعةِ (٣). ولم يَعْتَبِرْ محمدُ بن الحسنِ الدِّينَ، إلَّا أن يكونَ ممَّن يَسْكَرُ ويَخْرُجُ ويَسْخَرُ منه (٤) الصِّبْيانُ، فلا يكون كُفْؤًا؛ لأنَّ الغالِبَ على الجُنْدِ الفِسْقُ، ولا يُعَدُّ (٥) ذلك نَقْصًا، والدليلُ على اعْتِبارِ الدِّينِ قولُه تعالى: {أَفَمَنْ كَانَ مُؤْمِنًا كَمَنْ كَانَ فَاسِقًا لَا يَسْتَوُونَ} (٦). ولأنَّ الفاسِقَ مَرْذولٌ مَرْدودُ الشَّهادةِ والرِّوايةِ، غيرُ مَأْمونٍ على النَّفْس والمالِ، مَسْلُوبُ الوِلَاياتِ (٧)، ناقصٌ عند اللَّه تعالى وعندَ خَلْقِه، قليلُ الحَظِّ فى (٨) الدُّنيا والآخرةِ، فلا يجوزُ أن يكونَ كُفْؤًا لِعَفِيفةٍ، ولا مُساوِيًا لها، لكن يكونُ كُفؤًا لمِثْلِه. فأمَّا الفاسِقُ من الجُنْدِ، فهو

Notes

(١) فى م: "والدين".(٢) سقط من: م.(٣) سقط من: الأصل، أ.(٤) فى م: "معه".(٥) فى ب، م: "ويعد".(٦) سورة السجدة ١٨.(٧) فى م: "الولاية".(٨) فى ب: "من".

PreviousVolume 9 · Page 391Next
Previous9·391Next