12- ʿAbd al-Wahhāb b. ʿAlī al-Subkī (d. 771 AH).
In his book Ṭabaqāt al-Shāfiʿiyya (3/132-133).
He is among those who deny the elevation of Allah, the Exalted, over His creation and His establishment over His Throne. He says in his Ṭabaqāt (9/34) in the biography of Aḥmad b. Yaḥyā b. Ismāʿīl: "...and I came across a work he authored negating direction in refutation of Ibn Taymiyya, which is not bad." End quote.
He commented on the statement of Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Malik al-Karajī (d. 532 AH), may Allah have mercy on him, in his poem on the Sunna:
Their creed is that the Deity, by His Essence... is upon His Throne, along with His knowledge of the unseen.
Al-Subkī said in his Ṭabaqāt (6/143): "There is nothing in it whose meaning is objectionable except his statement: (by His Essence)." End quote.
The commentary on the Jahmī negation of the word "(by His Essence)" will come on (p. 127).
13- Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī (d. 852 AH).
Al-Dhahabī commented in al-Mīzān (3/507) on the story of Ibn Ḥibbān's expulsion from Sijistan due to his denial of Al-Ḥadd for Allah, the Exalted, saying: "And he [meaning: the one who affirmed Al-Ḥadd to the one who denied it] said: You have equated your Lord with a non-existent thing, since the non-existent has no limit." End quote.
So Ibn Ḥajar said in Lisān al-Mīzān (5/114), commenting on this statement of al-Dhahabī: "His statement: (You have equated your Lord with a non-existent thing, since the non-existent has no limit) is low [i.e., a baseless statement]. For we do not concede that the statement of lacking a limit leads to equating Him with the non-existent after establishing His existence." End quote.
١٢- عبدالوهاب بن علي السُّبكي (٧٧١هـ).
في كتابه «طبقات الشافعية» (٣/ ١٣٢-١٣٣).
وهو ممن ينكر علو الله تعالى على خلقه واستواءه على عرشه، يقول في «طبقاته» (٩/ ٣٤) في ترجمة: أحمد بن يحيى بن إسماعيل .. ووقفت له على تصنيف صنفه في نفي الجهة ردًّا على ابن تيمية لا بأس به. اهـ
وعلَّق على قول محمد بن عبد الملك الكرجي (٥٣٢هـ) رحمه الله في قصيدته في السُّنة:
عقائدهم أن الإله بذاته ... على عرشه مع علمه بالغوائب
قال السُّبكي «طبقاته» (٦/ ١٤٣): ليس فيها ما ينكر معناه إلا قوله:
(بذاته). اهـ
وسيأتي التعليق على نفي الجهمية لكلمة: (بذاته) في (ص ١٢٧).
١٣- ابن حجر العسقلاني (٨٥٢ هـ).
فقد علَّقَ الذهبي في «الميزان» (٣/ ٥٠٧) على قصة إخراج ابن حبان من سجستان بسبب إنكاره الحد لله تعالى، فقال: وقال هو [يعني: من أثبت الحد لمن نفاه]: ساويتَ ربك بالشيء المعدوم، إذ المعدوم لا حدَّ له. اهـ
فقال ابن حجر في «لسان الميزان» (٥/ ١١٤) معلِّقًا على قول الذهبي هذا: قوله: (ساويتَ ربك بالشيء المعدوم، إذ المعدوم لا حدَّ له)؛ نازلٌ. [أي: كلامٌ ساقطٌ] فإنا لا نُسلِّم أن القول بعدم الحدِّ يفضي إلى مساواته بالمعدوم بعد تحقيق وجوده. اهـ