—such as that which we mentioned from al-Rabīʿ ibn Anas—they directed that to the likes of what was intended by him who said: Its interpretation is "I am Allah, I know" (Anā Allāhu aʿlam), in that each letter of it is part of the letters of a complete word whose indication of its completion rendered the mention of its completion unnecessary—even if they differed with him regarding every letter of that: Is it from the word that the proponents of the first view claimed it to be from, or from another? They said: Rather, the alif of "Alif-Lām-Mīm" is from various words, indicating the meanings of all of them and their completion. They said: Each letter of that was singled out and truncated from the full letters of the word only because if all the letters of the word were made explicit, the word that is made explicit—of which some of these disjointed letters are a part—would not indicate except a single meaning, not two or more meanings. They said: Since there would be no indication in that—if all of them were made explicit—except of its meaning which is a single meaning, and Allah, Glorified be His Praise, had intended to indicate by each letter of them many meanings for a single thing, it was not permissible except that the letter indicating those meanings be singled out, so that those addressed by it would know that Allah, Mighty and Majestic, did not intend a single meaning or an indication of a single thing by what He addressed them with, and that He only intended thereby to indicate many things. They said: Thus the alif of "Alif-Lām-Mīm" entails many meanings, among them the completion of the name of the Lord, which is "Allah", and the completion of the name of Allah's favors, which are the blessings (ālāʾ) of Allah, and the indication of the appointed term of a people being one year, since the alif in abjad (numerical) calculation (ḥisāb al-jummal) stands for one. The lām entails the completion of the name of Allah, which is Laṭīf (Subtle/Benevolent), and the completion of the name of His grace, which is luṭf (benevolence), and the indication of the appointed term of a people being thirty years. The mīm entails the completion of the name of Allah, which is Majīd (Glorious), and the completion of the name of His greatness, which is majd (glory), and the indication of the appointed term of a people being forty years. So the meaning of the speech—according to the interpretation of the proponent of the first view—was that Allah, Glorified be His Praise, opened His speech by describing Himself as the All-Knowing from Whom nothing is hidden, and He made that a path for His servants to follow at the opening of their speeches, letters, and important affairs, and a trial from Him for them so that they might deserve thereby the grand reward in the Abode of Recompense, just as He opened with {Praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds} and {Praise be to Allah, Who created the heavens and the earth} [Sūrat al-Anʿām: 1], and similar Sūras whose openings He made praise of Himself, and just as He made the openings of some of them the exalting and glorification of Himself through , as He, Glorified be His Praise, said: {Glory be to Him Who took His servant by night} [Sūrat al-Isrāʾ: 1], and similar verses from the rest of the Sūras of the Qurʾān, some of whose openings He made praising Himself, some glorifying Him, and some exalting and hallowing Him. Likewise, He made the openings of other Sūras whose beginnings are some of the letters of the alphabet praises of Himself, sometimes by knowledge, sometimes by justice and fairness, and sometimes by grace and beneficence, with brevity and conciseness, followed by the narration of matters after that.
This translation was produced with AI assistance and is part of an ongoing human-review process. Found a mistake? Use the feedback option in the reader menu.
According to this interpretation, the Alif, Lām, and Mīm must be in nominative positions, each raised by the other, independent of His saying {That is the Book}, and "that Book" is a predicate of a new subject, disconnected from the meaning of "Alif-Lām-Mīm". Likewise, "that" according to the interpretation of the proponent of this second view is nominative by each other, even though its meaning differs from the meaning of the statement of the proponent of the first view.
As for those who said: They are letters of the numerical calculation (ḥisāb al-jummal) to the exclusion of other conflicting meanings, they said: We know no understandable meaning for the disjointed letters other than ḥisāb al-jummal and spelling out the speaker's saying "Alif-Lām-Mīm". They said: It is not permissible that Allah, Glorified be His Praise, address His servants except with what they comprehend and understand from Him. Since that is the case—and His saying "Alif-Lām-Mīm" has no intelligible aspect to be directed to except one of the two aspects we mentioned, and one of its two aspects was invalidated, which is that the spelling of "Alif-Lām-Mīm" was intended—it is established and confirmed that the second aspect was intended, which is ḥisāb al-jummal; because it is not permissible for a speaker's saying "Alif-Lām-Mīm" to be immediately followed in speech by "that is the Book", due to the impossibility of the meaning of the speech and its departure from reason if "that is the Book" follows "Alif-Lām-Mīm".
And they also argued for their view with what:
246- Muḥammad ibn Ḥumayd al-Rāzī narrated to us, he said: Salama ibn al-Faḍl narrated to us, he said: Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq narrated to me, he said: Al-Kalbī narrated to me, from Abū Ṣāliḥ, from Ibn ʿAbbās, from Jābir ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Riʾāb, he said: