Razi (1/71). Ibn Kathir said: The scholars used this verse to argue—regarding the limitation of the attributes of this cow until it was specified or restricted after having been general—for the validity of a Salam (forward sale) contract involving animals. This is the school of Malik, Al-Awza'i, Al-Layth, Al-Shafi'i, Ahmad, and the majority of scholars, both the predecessors and the successors, based on the evidence established in the two Sahih collections from the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him: "A woman should not describe another woman to her husband as if he is looking at her."

Talkhis al-Habir: (3/6).

Just as the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, described the camels for blood money in cases of accidental and quasi-intentional killing with the attributes mentioned in the hadith. Abu Hanifah, Al-Thawri, and the Kufans said: A Salam contract is not valid for animals because their conditions cannot be precisely determined. Something similar was reported from Ibn Mas'ud, Hudhayfah ibn al-Yaman, 'Abd al-Rahman ibn Samurah, and others.

: 748: What they vomit: 3: Tafsir Mujahid: (1/79).

145: 752: That: 1: Tafsir 'Abd al-Razzaq (1/70) and Tafsir Ibn Kathir (1/112).

: 753: The dead: 2: The previous source for Ibn Kathir.

146: 757: I show them: 1: Tafsir 'Abd al-Razzaq: (1/71).

: 760: Weeping: 2: Tafsir Ibn Kathir: (1/113).

147: 764: By that: 1: Tafsir Mujahid: (1/80).

: 766: The stone: 2: In Sahih Muslim: "I indeed recognize a stone in Mecca that used to greet me before I was sent as a Prophet; I recognize it now."

Narrated by Muslim (p. 1782), Ahmad (5/89, 95), and Al-Darimi (1/12).