The jurists consider the two hands as one limb, and the two feet as one limb, and sequence is not mandatory within a single limb. The statement of 'Ali and Ibn Mas'ud has indicated this.
Section: If one performs his wudu' in reverse, beginning with something of his members before his face, what he washed before his face is not counted for him. If he then washes his face while his intention remains, or a short time after it, it is counted for him, and then he performs the sequence for the remaining three members. If he washes his face, then wipes his head, then washes his hands and his feet, he must repeat the wiping of his head and the washing of his feet. If he washes his face and his hands, then washes his feet, then wipes his head, his wudu' is valid except for the washing of the feet. If he performs his entire wudu' in reverse, only the washing of his face is valid for him (2). If he performs wudu' in reverse four times, his wudu' is valid; he acquires the washing of one limb from each time if they are close together. The school of al-Shafi'i is like what we have mentioned. If he washes his members all at once, only the washing of his face is valid, because he did not perform the sequence. If he is immersed in flowing water and no more than a single flow passes over his members, then it is the same. If four flows pass over him, and we say that washing suffices for wiping, then it suffices him, just as if he had performed wudu' four times. If the water is stagnant, some of our companions said: If he brings out his face, then his hands, then wipes his head, then exits the water, it suffices him, because the hadath (impurity) is only lifted by the separation of the water from the member. Ahmad explicitly stated regarding a man who wanted to perform wudu' and immersed himself in the water, then exited the water, that he must wipe his head and wash his feet. This indicates that if the water is flowing and a single flow passes over him, he is satisfied by wiping his head [then washing] (3) his feet. If both types of hadath (minor and major) are combined, the requirement for sequence and immediacy falls away, according to what we shall mention, if God Almighty wills.
(2) Omitted from MS: M. (3) In M: "and wash".
والفُقَهاءُ يَعُدّونَ اليَدَيْنِ عُضْوًا، والرِّجْلَيْنِ عُضْوًا، ولا يَجِبُ التَّرْتِيبُ في العُضْوِ الوَاحِدِ، وقد دَلَّ عَلَى ذلك قَوْلُ عَلِىٍّ وابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ.
فصل: وإذا نَكَسَ وُضُوءَهُ، فبَدَأَ بشَىءٍ مِنْ أَعْضائِه قَبْلَ وَجْهِهِ، لم يُحْتَسَبْ بما غَسَلَهُ قَبْلَ وَجْهِه، فإذا غَسَلَ وَجْهَهُ مع بَقَاءِ نِيَّتِه أو بَعْدَها بِزَمَنٍ يَسِيرٍ احْتُسِبَ له به، ثم يُرَتِّبُ الأَعْضاءَ الثَّلاثةَ. وإن غَسَلَ وَجْهَهُ ثُمَّ مَسَحَ رَأْسَه ثم غَسَلَ يَدَيْه ورِجْلَيْه، أعَادَ مَسْحَ رَأْسِه وغَسْلَ رِجْلَيْه. وإن غَسَلَ وَجْهَه ويَدَيْه ثم غَسَلَ رِجْلَيْه ثم مَسَحَ رَأْسَه، صَحَّ وُضُوؤُهُ إلّا غَسْلَ رِجْلَيْه. وإن نَكَسَ وُضُوءَهُ جَمِيعَه، لَمْ يَصِحّ له (٢) إلّا غَسْلُ وَجْهِه. وإن تَوَضَّأَ مُنَكِّسا أرْبَعَ مَرَّاتٍ، صَحَّ وُضُوؤُهُ، يَحْصُلُ لَهُ مِنْ كُلِّ مَرَّةٍ غَسْلُ عُضْوٍ إذا كان مُتَقَارِبا. ومَذْهَبُ الشافِعِىِّ مِثْلُ ما ذَكَرْنا. ولو غَسَلَ أعْضاءَهُ دَفْعَةً واحدةً لم يَصِحّ له إلا غَسْلُ وَجْهِهِ، لأنه لم يُرَتِّبْ. وإن انْغَمَسَ في ماءٍ جَارٍ فلم يَمُرَّ عَلَى أعْضائِه إلا جِرْيَةٌ واحدةٌ فكذلك. وإن مَرَّ عليه أرْبَعُ جِرياتٍ، وقلنا: الغَسْلُ يُجْزِىءُ عنِ المَسْحِ. أجْزَأَه، كما لو تَوَضَّأَ أَرْبَعَ مَرَّاتٍ. وإن كان الماءُ راكِدًا، فقال بَعْضُ أصْحَابِنَا: إذا أخْرَجَ وَجْهَه ثم يَدَيْه ثم مَسَحَ رَأْسَه ثم خَرَجَ من الماءِ، أجْزَأَهُ؛ لأنَّ الحَدَثَ إنَّما يَرْتَفِعُ بانْفِصَالِ الماءِ عنِ العُضْوِ، ونَصَّ أحمدُ في رَجُلٍ أرادَ الوُضُوءَ فانْغَمَسَ في الماءِ، ثم خَرَجَ من الماءِ، فعَلَيْه مَسْحُ رَأْسِه وغَسْلُ رِجْلَيْهِ. وهذا يَدُلُّ علَى أنَّ الماءَ إذا كان جَارِيًا فمَرَّتْ عليه جِرْيةٌ واحِدةٌ، أنه يُجْزِئه مَسْحُ رَأْسِه [ثم يغسلُ] (٣) رِجْلَيْه. وإن اجْتَمَعَ الحَدَثان، سَقَطَ التَّرْتِيبُ والمُوالاةُ. على ما سَنَذْكُرهُ، إن شاءَ اللَّه تَعالَى.
فصل: ولم يَذْكُر الخِرَقِىُّ المُوَالاةَ، وهى واجِبَةٌ عند أحمد، نَصَّ عَلَيْها في مَواضِعَ. وهذا قَوْلُ الأَوْزَاعِىِّ، وأحدُ قَوْلَىِ الشَّافِعِىِّ. قال القاضِى: ونَقَلَ حَنْبَلُ، عن أحمدَ، أنها غَيْرُ واجِبَةٍ. وهذا قولُ أبى حَنِيفَةَ؛ لظاهِرِ الآية، ولأنَّ المَأْمُورَ به
(٢) سقط من: م.(٣) في م: "وغسل".