Chapter: Divorce by Calculation
1279 - Issue: He said: "And if he says to her: 'Half of you is divorced,' or 'your hand,' or 'a limb of your limbs is divorced,' or he says to her: 'You are divorced half a divorce,' or 'a quarter of a divorce,' one divorce occurs."
The discussion on this issue is in two sections:
The first is when he divorces a part of her. The second is when he divorces a part of a divorce.
As for the first, whenever he divorces a part of the woman's fixed parts, the whole of her becomes divorced, whether it is an undifferentiated part, such as half of her, or a sixth of her, or a part of a thousand parts of her, or a specific part, such as her hand, her head, or her finger. This is the opinion of al-Hasan, the school of al-Shafi'i, Abu Thawr, and Ibn al-Qasim, the companion of Malik. The Hanafis (Ashab al-Ra'y) held the view that if he attributes it to an undifferentiated part, or one of five limbs: the head, face, neck, back, or the private part, she becomes divorced. If he attributes it to a specific part other than these five, she does not become divorced, because it is a part without which the whole remains, or a part through which the whole is not represented, so the woman is not divorced by the attribution of divorce to it, such as a tooth or a fingernail. Our view is that he has attributed divorce to a fixed part, which he made lawful through the marriage contract, so it resembles an undifferentiated part and the five limbs. Furthermore, it is a whole that does not become divisible regarding lawfulness and prohibition; when a factor requiring prohibition or lawfulness is found in it, the ruling of prohibition prevails, just as if a Muslim and a Magian were to join in killing game. The analogy they made differs; for it is not a fixed part, and hair and nails are not fixed parts, as they disappear and are replaced, and touching them does not invalidate ritual purity.
(1) In M: "and the school of." (2) In B and M, there is an addition: "of it."
بابُ الطَّلاقِ بالحِسَاب
١٢٧٩ - مسألة؛ قال: (وَإِذَا قَالَ لَهَا: نِصْفُكِ طَالِقٌ، أَوْ يَدُكِ، أو عُضْوٌ مِنْ أَعْضَائِكِ طَالِقٌ. أَوْ قَالَ لَهَا: أَنْتِ طَالِقٌ نِصْفَ تَطلِيقَةٍ، أَوْ رُبْعَ تَطْلِيقَه. وَقَعَتْ بهَا وَاحِدَةٌ)
الكلامُ فى هذه المسألةِ فى فصلَيْنِ:
أحدُهما، أنَّه إذا طَلَّقَ جُزءًا منها. والثّانى، إذا طَلّقَ جُزءًا مِن طَلْقةٍ.
فأمّا الأوّلُ، فإنَّه متى طَلَّقَ من المرأةِ جُزءًا مِن أجزائِها الثّابتةِ، طَلُقَتْ كُلُّها، سَواءٌ كان جُزءًا شائعًا، كنِصْفِها، أو سُدْسِها، أو جزءًا مِن ألْفِ جُزءٍ منها، أو جُزءًا مُعَيَّنًا، كيَدِها، أو رأْسِها، أو أُصْبُعها. وهذا قولُ الحسنِ، ومذهبُ الشَّافعىِّ، وأبى ثَوْرٍ، وابن القاسمِ صاحبِ مالكٍ. وذهَب (١) أصحابُ الرَّأْىِ، إلى أنَّه إن أضافَه إلى جُزءٍ شائعٍ، أو واحدٍ من أعْضاءٍ خمسةٍ؛ الرّأس، والوجهِ، والرَّقَبَةِ، والظَّهْرِ، والفَرْجِ، طَلُقَتْ. وإِنْ أضافه إلى جُزءٍ مُعَيَّن، غيرِ هذه الخمسةِ، لم تَطْلُقْ؛ لأنَّه جزءٌ تَبْقَى الجُملةُ (٢) بدُونِه، أو جزءٌ لا يُعبَّرُ به عن الجملةِ، فلم تَطْلُقِ المرأةُ بإضافةِ الطّلاقِ إليه، كالسِّنِّ، والظُّفْرِ. ولَنا، أنَّه أضافَ الطَّلاقَ إلى جُزْءٍ ثابتٍ، اسْتباحَه بعَقْدِ النِّكاحِ، فأشْبَهَ الجزءَ الشائعَ، والأعضاءَ الخمسةَ، ولأنَّها جُملةٌ لا تَتَبَعَّضُ فى الحِلِّ والحُرْمَةِ، وُجِدَ فيها ما يَقْتضِى التَّحْريمَ والإِباحةَ، فغَلَبَ فيها حُكْمُ التَّحْريمِ، كما لو اشْتَركَ مسلمٌ ومَجُوسىٌّ فى قتل صَيْدٍ، وفارقَ ما قاسُوا عليه؛ فإنَّه ليس بثابتٍ، والشَّعْرُ والظُّفرُ ليس بثابتٍ، فإنَّهما
(١) فى م: "ومذهب".(٢) فى ب، م زيادة: "منه".