Abu Thawr and Ibn al-Mundhir. Malik and the scholars of opinion said: If he does so, he has erred against the Sunnah, but the separation is valid and the child is disavowed from him, because Allah Almighty conjoined her li'an with his li'an using the letter "wa" (and), which does not necessitate sequential order. Furthermore, the li'an has been produced by both of them, so it is similar to a case where she did observe the order. According to al-Shafi'i, the li'an is not complete except through sequencing, but in his view, the man's li'an alone suffices for the disavowal of the child, and that result is achieved even with his failure to observe the order and the lack of completeness in the woman's formulas of li'an. Our argument is that he has performed the li'an in a manner contrary to what has been conveyed in the Qur'an and the Sunnah, so it is not valid, just as if he had limited himself to only one phrase. Moreover, the man's li'an is his evidence for establishing her adultery and disavowing her child, while the woman's li'an is for denial, so the evidence of establishment is prioritized, just as witnesses are prioritized over oaths. Also, the woman's li'an is for averting the punishment from herself, and this is not addressed to her except through the man's li'an; so if she presented her li'an before his, she has presented it before its time, and therefore it is not valid, just as if she had presented it before the accusation. The fourth condition is that he must mention the disavowal of the child in the li'an. If he does not mention it, he is not disavowed, unless he repeats the li'an and mentions his disavowal. This is the apparent meaning of the words of al-Khiraqi, the preference of the Qadi, and the school of al-Shafi'i. Abu Bakr said: He does not need to mention the child or his disavowal, as he is disavowed by the termination of the marital bed (firash), because the hadith of Sahl ibn Sa'd, in which he described the li'an, did not mention the child in it, and he said therein: "The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) separated them and decreed that her child should not be attributed to a father, nor should her child be reviled." Narrated by Abu Dawud. In a hadith narrated by Muslim from 'Abd Allah, a man performed li'an with his wife during the time of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) separated them and attached the child to his mother.
(7) In A, B, and M: "its order." (8) In the original, there is an addition: "that which." (9) In B and M: "so if." (10) In A, there is an addition: "from him." (11) Omitted in: B. (12) In: The Chapter of Li'an, from the Book of Divorce. Sunan Abi Dawud 1/521. (13) Its authentication was previously mentioned in: 8/373. (14) Meaning Ibn 'Umar.
أبو ثَوْرٍ، وابنُ المُنْذِرِ. وقال مالكٌ، وأصْحابُ الرَّأْىِ: إن فَعَلَ أخْطَأ السُّنّةَ، والفُرْقةُ جائزةٌ، ويَنْتَفِى الولدُ عنه؛ لأنَّ اللَّه تعالى عَطَفَ لِعانَها على لِعَانِه بالواوِ، وهى لا تَقْتَضِى تَرْتِيبًا (٧)، ولأنَّ اللِّعانَ قد وُجِدَ منهما جميعًا، فأشْبَهَ ما لو رتّبَتْ. وعند الشافعىِّ، لا يَتِمُّ اللِّعانُ إلّا بالتَّرْتيبِ، إلَّا أنَّه (٨) يَكْفِى عنده لِعَانُ الرَّجُلِ وحدَه لنَفْىِ الولدِ، وذلك حاصلٌ مع إخْلالِه بالتَّرْتيبِ، وعَدَمِ كَمالِ ألَفاظِ اللِّعانِ من المرأةِ. ولَنا، أَنَّه أتَى باللِّعانِ على غيرِ ما وَرَدَ به القرآنُ والسُّنَّةُ، فلم يَصِحَّ، كما لو اقْتَصَرَ على لَفْظةٍ واحدةٍ، ولأنَّ لِعانَ الرجلِ بَيِّنَتُه لإِثْباتِ زِنَاها وَنَفْىِ ولدِها، ولِعانَ المرأةِ للإِنْكارِ، فقُدِّمَتْ بَيِّنةُ الإِثْباتِ، كتَقْديمِ الشُّهودِ على الأيْمانِ، ولأنَّ لِعانَ المرأةِ لدَرْءِ العَذابِ عنها، ولا يتَوَجَّهُ عليها ذلك إلَّا بلِعانِ الرَّجُلِ، فإذا قَدَّمَتْ لِعانَها على لِعانِه، فقد قَدَّمَتْه على وَقْتِه، فلم يَصِحَّ، كما لو قدّمَتْه على القَذْفِ. الشَّرْط الرابع، أَن يَذْكُرَ نَفْىَ الولدِ فى اللِّعانِ، فإنْ (٩) لم يَذْكُرْ، لم يَنْتَفِ (١٠)، إلّا أَن يُعِيدَ اللّعانَ ويذكرَ نَفْيَه. وهذا ظاهرُ كلامِ الخِرَقِىِّ، واختيارُ القاضِى، ومذهبُ الشافعىِّ. وقال أبو بكرٍ: لا يَحْتاجُ إلى ذِكْرِ الولدِ ونَفْيِه، ويَنْتَفِى بزَوَالِ الفِرَاشِ؛ لأنَّ حَدِيثَ سَهْلِ بن سعدٍ، الذى وَصَفَ فيه اللعانَ، لم يذَكُرْ فيه الولدَ، وقال فيه: ففَرَّقَ رسولُ اللَّه -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- بينهما، وقَضَى أَن لا يُدْعَى وَلَدُها (١١) لأبٍ، ولا يُرْمَى ولدُها. روَاه أبو داودَ (١٢). وفى حديثٍ روَاه مسلمٌ (١٣)، عن عبد اللَّه (١٤)، أَن رَجُلًا لَاعَنَ امرأتَه على عهدِ رَسُولِ اللَّه -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-، ففَرّقَ النَّبِىُّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- بينهما، وألْحَقَ الولدَ
(٧) فى أ، ب، م: "ترتيبها".(٨) فى الأصل زيادة: "مما".(٩) فى ب، م: "فإذا".(١٠) فى أزيادة: "عنه".(١١) فى سقط من: ب.(١٢) فى: باب اللعان، من كتاب الطلاق. سنن أبى داود ١/ ٥٢١.(١٣) تقدم تخريجه فى: ٨/ ٣٧٣.(١٤) أى ابن عمر.