ShamelaTranslate
بحث
تسجيل الدخول
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. مشروع علمي مفتوح الوصول.

حولتواصلتبرّعبيانات النشرالخصوصيةشروط الاستخدامحق الانسحابإلغاء اشتراك
المغني لابن قدامة - ت التركي
مجلد 11 · صفحة 174فى هذه المسألة مسألتان

الترجمة · EN

he is among the truthful in what he accused me of regarding adultery.

In this issue, there are two matters:

The first: That the lian (imprecation) is not valid except in the presence of the judge (hakim) or his representative. This is the school of al-Shafi'i, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) ordered Hilal ibn Umayya to summon his wife to him, and he invoked lian between them. Also, because it is either an oath or a testimony, and whichever it is, the judge is a condition for it. If the two spouses agree to perform the lian between themselves without the judge, it is not valid, because lian is based on severity and confirmation, so it is not permitted without the judge, like the hadd (prescribed punishment). It makes no difference whether the spouses are free or enslaved, according to the apparent statement of al-Khiraqi. The followers of al-Shafi'i said: The master may invoke lian between his male slave and his female slave, because he has the right to establish the hadd upon them. Our position is that it is a lian between two spouses, so it is not permitted for anyone other than the judge or his deputy, just as the lian between two free people. We do not concede that the master possesses the authority to establish the hadd upon his married slave girl. Furthermore, the lian does not resemble the hadd, because the hadd is a deterrent and disciplinary, whereas the lian is either a testimony or an oath; thus, they are distinct. Moreover, the lian serves to both avert the hadd and necessitate it, so it functions in the manner of establishing evidence for adultery and ruling based upon it or by negating it. If the woman is shy and does not appear for her needs, the judge shall send his deputy and send trustworthy men with him so that they may perform the lian between them; and if he sends his deputy alone, it is permissible, because the gathering [of witnesses] is not mandatory.

Section: It is recommended that the lian be in the presence of a group of Muslims, because Ibn Abbas, Ibn Umar, and Sahl ibn Sa'd were present [at one] despite their young age, which indicates that a large group was present, for children only attend gatherings as followers of men. Also, because lian is built upon severity, as an exaggeration in deterrence and restraint, and performing it in a group is more effective in that regard. It is recommended that they not be fewer than four, because the evidence for adultery, for which the lian was legislated on account of the accusation, is four, though none of this is mandatory.

الحواشي

(2) In (M): "he accused her". (3) Its documentation has preceded in: 8/373. (4) Omitted from: (B). (5) In (B): "in".

العربية (المصدر)

كَانَ مِنَ الصَّادِقِينَ فِيَما رَمَانِى (٢) بِهِ مِنَ الزِّنَى).

فى هذه المسألة مَسْألتان:

إحداهما: أَنَّ اللِّعانَ لا يَصِحُّ إلَّا بمَحْضرٍ من الحاكمِ، أو مَن يَقُومُ مَقامَه. وهذا مذهبُ الشافعىِّ؛ لأنَّ النَّبِىَّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- أمَرَ هِلالَ بن أُمَيّةَ أن يَسْتَدْعِىَ زَوْجَتَه إليه، ولَاعَنَ بينهما (٣). ولأنَّه إمَّا يَمِينٌ، وإمَّا شهادةٌ، وأيُّهما كان، فمِنْ شَرْطِه الحاكمُ. وإن تَرَاضَى الزَّوْجانِ بغيرِ الحاكمِ يُلاعِنُ بينهما، لم يَصِحَّ ذلك؛ لأنَّ اللِّعانَ مَبْنِىٌّ على التَّغْلِيظِ والتَّأْكِيدِ، فلم يَجُزْ بغيرِ الحاكمِ، كالحَدِّ. وسَواءٌ كان الزَّوْجانِ حُرَّيْنِ أو مَمْلُوكينِ، فى ظاهرِ كلامِ الْخِرَقِىِّ. وقال أصحابُ الشافعىِّ: للسَّيِّدِ أن يُلاعِنَ بينَ عَبْدِه وأمَتِه؛ لأنَّ له إقامَةَ الحَدِّ عليهما. ولَنا، أنَّه لِعانٌ بينَ زَوْجينِ، فلم يَجُزْ لغيرِ الحاكمِ أو نائِبِه، كاللِّعانِ بينَ الحُرَّيْنِ. ولا نُسَلِّمُ أَنَّ السَّيِّدَ يَمْلِكُ إقامةَ الحَدِّ على أمَتِه المُزَوَّجَةِ، ثم لا يُشْبِهُ اللِّعانُ الحَدَّ؛ لأنَّ الحَدَّ زَجْرٌ وتَأْدِيبٌ، واللِّعانُ إمَّا شهادة وإمَّا يمينٌ، فافْتَرَقا، ولأنَّ اللِّعانَ دارِئٌ للحَدِّ، ومُوجِبٌ له، فجَرَى مَجْرَى إقامةِ البَيِّنةِ على الزِّنَى والحُكْمِ به أو بنَفْيِهِ. وإن كانتِ المرأةُ خَفِرةً لا تَبْرُزُ لحوائِجِها، بَعَثَ الحاكمُ نائِبَه، وَبعَثَ معه عُدُولًا، ليُلَاعِنُوا بينهما، وإن بَعَثَ نائِبَه وحدَه جازَ؛ لأنَّ الجَمْعَ غيرُ واجِبٍ.

فصل: ويُسْتَحَبُّ أن يكونَ اللعانُ بمَحْضرِ جماعةٍ من المُسْلِمِينَ؛ لأنَّ ابنَ عباسٍ وابنَ عمرَ وسَهْلَ بن سعدٍ حَضَرُوه مع حداثةِ أسْنانِهم، فدَلَّ ذلك على أنَّه حَضَره جمعٌ كثيرٌ؛ لأنَّ الصِّبْيانَ إنَّما يَحْضُرُونَ المجالسَ تَبَعًا للرِّجالِ، ولأنَّ اللِّعانَ بُنِىَ على التَّغْليظِ، مُبالَغةً فى الرَّدْع به (٤) والزَّجْرِ، وفِعْلُه فى الجماعةِ أبْلَغُ فى (٥) ذلك. ويُسْتَحَبُّ أن لا يَنْقُصُوا عن أرْبَعةٍ؛ لأنَّ بَيِّنةَ الزِّنَى الذى شُرِعَ اللعانُ من أجْلِ الرَّمْىِ به أرْبعَةٌ، وليس

الحواشي

(٢) فى م: "رماها".(٣) تقدم تخريجه فى: ٨/ ٣٧٣.(٤) سقط من: ب.(٥) فى ب: "من".

السابقمجلد 11 · صفحة 174التالي
السابق11·174التالي