equal to the other leg, then it is the primary one. If it is longer than it, and the other is equal to the other leg, then it is the primary one. If he has two feet on each leg, and he is able to walk on the long ones in a straight manner, then they are the primary ones. If he is not able to, and they are cut off, and he becomes able to walk on the short ones, then they are the primary ones, and the other two are supernumerary. If the long ones become paralyzed, then the blood money is due for them, because the outward appearance is that they are the primary ones. If someone cuts them off, and he is able to walk on the short ones, it is made clear that they are the primary ones; but if he is not able to, then the long ones are the primary ones.

1493 - Issue; he said: (And for the two breasts, the blood money is due, whether it is from a man or a woman).

As for the breasts of a woman, the blood money is due for them. We do not know of any disagreement among the people of knowledge regarding this, and for one of them, half of the blood money is due. Ibn al-Mundhir said: Everyone we know of among the people of knowledge has reached consensus that in the breast of a woman, half of the blood money is due, and for both breasts, the full blood money is due. Among those from whom we have memorized this are al-Hasan, al-Sha'bi, al-Zuhri, Makhul, Qatada, Malik, al-Thawri, al-Shafi'i, and the People of Opinion (Ashab al-Ra'y). This is because they contain beauty and benefit, so they are similar to the two hands and the two legs. For one of them, half of the blood money is due, because for any two organs for which blood money is due for both, half of it is due for one of them, like the hands. Regarding the cutting of the two nipples of the breasts, their blood money is due. Ahmad, may Allah have mercy on him, specified this, and something similar is reported from al-Sha'bi, al-Nakha'i, and al-Shafi'i. Malik and al-Thawri said: If the milk is gone, their blood money is due, otherwise