that, so that it does not lead to alienation from Islam, is more fitting; for when they possess strength, they become infidels who are entrenched in their territory, thus they resemble the people of war. The statement of Abu Bakr is interpreted as referring to what remains of the wealth in their hands; in this way, the school of Ahmad and the school of al-Shafi'i are the same on this matter. This is more equitable and correct, God Almighty willing. As for one who has no position of strength, he is liable for what he destroyed of life and wealth, just like an individual among the Muslims or the people of the covenant; because he has no position of strength, and such [destruction] would not be widespread from him, so the wealth and life remain with respect to him under their [original] protection and the obligation of liability for them. And Allah knows best.