ShamelaTranslate
بحث
تسجيل الدخول
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. مشروع علمي مفتوح الوصول.

حولتواصلتبرّعبيانات النشرالخصوصيةشروط الاستخدامحق الانسحابإلغاء اشتراك
المغني لابن قدامة - ت التركي
مجلد 13 · صفحة 69الفصل الخامس

الترجمة · EN

Abu Thawr, Dawud, and Ibn al-Mundhir said: The spoils belong to every killer, based on the generality of the report and the argument from this hadith of Salamah. Our evidence is that Ibn Mas'ud finished off Abu Jahl, yet the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) did not give him his spoils. He also ordered the killing of 'Uqbah ibn Abi (31) Mu'ayt and al-Nadr ibn al-Harith by execution (sabr), and did not give their spoils to those who killed them. He also killed the Banu Qurayzah by execution (32), and did not give their spoils to those who killed them. He only granted the spoils to one who killed an opponent in single combat, or who spared the Muslims from his evil and risked his own life in killing him. As for the fugitive after the war has ended, he has already spared the Muslims the evil of himself, and his killer did not risk his life in killing him; therefore, he is not entitled to his spoils, just like the captive. As for the one killed by Salamah, he was retreating to his group. Likewise, whoever is killed while the war is ongoing, even if (33) he is fleeing, he is retreating to his group and returning to the fight, so he resembles one who attacks, for war consists of retreating and attacking. Once this is established, it is not a condition for being entitled to the spoils that the single combat be by permission of the commander, because among all those for whom a ruling for the spoils was made during the era of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), there is no one among them who has been reported to us as having been given permission for the single combat, while the generality of the report dictates the entitlement of the spoils to every killer, except for the one excluded by evidence.

Chapter Five: The spoils are not subject to the one-fifth (khums) tax. This is narrated from Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas. This is also the position of al-Shafi'i, Ibn al-Mundhir, and Ibn Jarir. Ibn 'Abbas said: It is subject to the one-fifth tax (34). This is also the position of al-Awza'i and Makhul, based on the generality of the Almighty's saying: {And know that anything you take as booty, then for Allah is one-fifth thereof} (35). Ishaq said: If the Imam considers the spoils to be excessive, he may tax it by one-fifth, and that is up to him, based on what Ibn Sirin narrated: That al-Bara' ibn Malik engaged in single combat with a Marzuban (Persian commander) of the Zarah in Bahrain. He stabbed him and broke his spine, then took his bracelets and his spoils. When 'Umar prayed the Dhuhr prayer, he went to Abu Talhah in his house and said: "We used not to tax the spoils, but the spoils of al-Bara' have reached a large amount, and I am taxing them by one-fifth." Thus, the first spoils taxed by one-fifth in Islam were the spoils of al-Bara'. Sa'id recorded it in "al-Sunan" (36). It states therein that the spoils of al-Bara' reached thirty thousand.

الحواشي

(31) Omitted from: Original, M. (32) See what preceded on page 46. (33) In M: "that". (34) Recorded by al-Bayhaqi, in: The Chapter on What Has Been Related Regarding Taxing the Spoils by One-Fifth, from the Book of the Division of Spoils and Booty. Al-Sunan al-Kubra 6/312. And by Ibn Abi Shaybah, in: The Chapter on One Who Assigned the Spoils to the Killer, from the Book of Jihad. Al-Musannaf 12/374. And by Abu 'Ubayd, in: Al-Amwal 304. (35) Surah al-Anfal 41.

العربية (المصدر)

أبو ثَوْرٍ، وداودُ، وابنُ المُنْذِر: السَّلَبُ لكلِّ قاتلٍ؛ لعُمومِ الخَبَرِ، واحْتِجاجًا بحديثِ سَلَمَةَ هذا. ولَنا، أنَّ ابنَ مسعودٍ ذَفَّفَ على أبى جَهْلٍ، فلم يُعْطِه النَّبِىُّ -صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ- سَلَبهُ، وأمَرَ بقَتْلِ عُقْبَةَ بن أبى (٣١) مُعَيْط والنَّضْرِ بن الحارِث صَبْرًا، ولم يُعْطِ سَلَبَهما مَن قَتَلَهُما، وقتل بنى قُرَيْظَةَ صَبْرًا (٣٢)، فلم يُعْطِ مَن قتلَهُم أسْلابَهُم، وإنَّما أعْطَى السَّلَبَ مَنْ قتلَ مُبارِزًا، أو كفَى المسلمينَ شرَّه، وغرَّر فى قَتْلِه، والمُنْهَزِمُ بعدَ انْقِضاءِ الحَرْبِ، قد كفَى المسلمين شَرَّ نَفْسِه، ولم يُغَرِّرْ قاتلُه بنَفْسِه فى قَتْلِه، فلم يسْتَحِقَّ سَلَبَهُ كالأسيرِ. وأما الذى قَتَلَه سَلَمَةُ، فكان مُتحيِّزًا إلى فِئَةٍ. وكذلك مَنْ قُتِلَ حالَ قيامِ الحَرْبِ، فإنَّه وإنْ (٣٣) كان مُنْهَزِمًا فهو مُتَحَيِّزٌ إلى فِئَةٍ، وراجعٌ إلى القتالِ، فأشْبَهَ الكارَّ، فإنَّ القتالَ فرٌّ وكَرٌّ. إذا ثَبَت هذا، فإنَّه لا يُشْتَرَطُ فى اسْتِحْقاقِ السَّلَبِ أنْ تكونَ المُبارَزَةُ بإذْنِ الأميرِ؛ لأنَّ كلَّ مَنْ قُضِىَ له بالسَّلَبِ فى عصرِ النَّبِىِّ -صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ-، ليس فيهم مَنْ نُقِلَ إلينا أنَّه أُذِنَ له فى المُبارَزَةِ، مع أنَّ عُمومَ الخبرِ يقْتَضِى اسْتِحْقاقَ السَّلَبِ لكلِّ قاتلٍ، إلَّا مَنْ خَصَّه الدَّليلُ.

الفصل الخامس: أنَّ السَّلَبَ لا يُخَمَّسُ. رُوِىَ ذلك عن سَعْدٍ بن أبى وَقَّاص. وبه قال الشافِعِىُّ، وابنُ المُنْذِرِ، وابنُ جرير. وقال ابنُ عباس: يُخَمَّسُ (٣٤). وبه قال الأوْزَاعِىُّ، ومَكْحولٌ؛ لعمومِ قولِه تعالى: {وَاعْلَمُوا أَنَّمَا غَنِمْتُمْ مِنْ شَيْءٍ فَأَنَّ لِلَّهِ خُمُسَهُ} (٣٥). وقال إسحاقُ: إن اسْتَكْثَرَ الإمامُ السَّلَبَ خمَّسَهُ، وذلك إليه؛ لما رَوَى ابنُ سِيرينَ، أنَّ الْبَراءَ بنَ مالِك بارَزَ مَرْزُبانَ الزَّأْرة بالبَحْرَيْن، فَطَعَنَه فَدقَّ صُلْبَه، وأخَذَ سِوَارَيْهِ وسَلَبَه، فلمَّا صلّى عمرُ الظُّهْرَ، أتَى أبا طَلْحَةَ فى دارِه، فقال: إنَّا كُنَّا لا

الحواشي

(٣١) سقط من: الأصل، م.(٣٢) انظر ما تقدم فى صفحة ٤٦.(٣٣). فى م: "إن".(٣٤) أخرجه البيهقى، فى: باب ما جاء فى تخميس السلب، من كتاب قسم الفىء والغنيمة. السنن الكبرى ٦/ ٣١٢. وابن أبى شيبة، فى: باب من جعل السلب للقاتل، من كتاب الجهاد. المصنف ١٢/ ٣٧٤. وأبو عبيد، فى: الأموال ٣٠٤.(٣٥) سورة الأنفال ٤١.

السابقمجلد 13 · صفحة 69التالي
السابق13·69التالي