"By Allah, you intended nothing but one [divorce]." And in the hadith of al-Hadrami and al-Kindi, the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: "Do you have evidence?" He replied: "No, but I will make him swear; by Allah, he knows that it is my land that he usurped from me." Narrated by Abu Dawood. Uthman said to Ibn Umar: "Swear by Allah that you sold it and there is no defect in it that you know of." And because there is sufficiency in [the name of] Allah, it is required that His name suffice in the oath, like the position they agreed upon. As for the hadith of Ibn Abbas and Umar, it indicates the permissibility of demanding an oath in such a manner, while what we have mentioned indicates that the name of Allah alone is sufficient; and what the others mentioned is an arbitrary claim (tahakkum) for which there is no text (nass), nor does analogy (qiyas) require it. Once this is established, the oath in the right of both the Muslim and the disbeliever alike is by Allah the Exalted; no one shall swear by other than Him, due to the saying of Allah the Exalted: "...and let them both swear by Allah." And due to the saying of the Prophet (peace be upon him): "Whoever is going to swear, let him swear by Allah or remain silent."
Section: The oath is legislated in the right of every defendant, whether he is a Muslim or a disbeliever, upright or corrupt, a woman or a man, due to the saying of the Prophet (peace be upon him): "The oath is upon the defendant." Shaqiq narrated from al-Ash'ath ibn Qays who said: "There was a piece of land between me and a man from the Jews, and he denied my claim. I brought him before the Prophet (peace be upon him), and the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said to me: 'Do you have evidence?' I said: 'No.' He said to the Jew: 'Swear.' I said: 'Then he will swear and walk away with my wealth.' So Allah the Exalted revealed: 'Indeed, those who exchange the covenant of Allah and their [own] oaths for a small price...' to the end of the verse." Narrated by al-Bukhari, Abu Dawood, and Ibn Majah. And in the hadith of al-Hadrami, I said: "He is a corrupt man,"
(9) Its verification has preceded in: 10/364. (10) Its verification has preceded in: page 32. (11) Narrated by Imam Malik, in: 'Chapter: Defect in Slaves', from the Book of Sales. Al-Muwatta 2/613. And al-Bayhaqi, in: 'Chapter: Sale of Immunity', from the Book of Sales. Al-Sunan al-Kubra 50/328. Abd al-Razzaq, in: 'Chapter: Selling with Immunity', from the Book of Sales. Al-Musannaf 8/162, 163. (12) In A: "that". (13) Its verification has preceded in: 11/6. (14) Its verification has preceded in: 6/587. (15) Surah Ali 'Imran: 77. (16) Narrated by al-Bukhari, in: 'Chapter: The Speech of Litigants Regarding One Another', from the Book of Litigations, and in: 'Chapter: The Judge Asking ="
"آللَّهِ مَا أَردْتَ إِلَّا وَاحِدَةً" (٩). وفى حديثِ الحَضْرَمِىِّ والكِنْدِىِّ، أَنَّ النَّبِىَّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-، قال: "أَلَكَ بَيِّنَةٌ؟ ". قال: لا، ولكن احَلِّفُهُ، واللَّهِ ما يَعْلَمُ أنَّها أرْضِى غَصَبَنِيها. رواه أبو داودَ (١٠). وقال عثمانُ لابنِ عمرَ: تحْلِفُ باللَّهِ لقد بِعْتَه وما به داءٌ تَعْلَمُه (١١). ولأنَّ فى اللَّهِ (١٢) كفايةً، فوجبَ أن يُكْتفَى باسْمِه فى اليَمِينِ، كالمَوْضعِ الذى سَلَّمُوه. فأمَّا حديثُ ابنِ عباس وعمرَ، فإنَّه يدُلُّ على جوازِ الاسْتِحْلافِ كذلك، وما ذكرْناه يدُلُّ على الاكْتفاءِ باسمِ اللَّهِ وحدَه، وما ذكرَه الباقون فتَحَكّمٌ لا نَصَّ فيه، ولا قِياسَ يَقْتضِيه. إذا ثبتَ هذا، فإِنَّ اليَمِينَ فى حقِّ المُسلمِ والكافرِ جميعًا باللَّهِ تعالى، لا يَحْلفُ أحدٌ بغَيرِه؛ لقولِ اللَّهِ تعالى: {فَيُقْسِمَانِ بِاللَّهِ}. ولِقولِ النَّبِىِّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-: "مَنْ كَانَ حَالِفًا، فَلْيَحْلِفْ بِاللَّهِ أَوْ ليَصْمُتْ" (١٣).
فصل: وتُشْرَعُ اليَمِينُ فى حقِّ كلِّ مُدَّعًى عليه، سواءٌ كان مُسلمًا أو كافرًا، عَدْلًا أو فاسقًا، امرأةً أو رَجلًا؛ لقولِ النَّبِىِّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-: "الْيَمِينُ عَلَى الْمُدَّعَى عَلَيْهِ" (١٤). وروَى شَقِيقٌ، عن الأشْعَثِ بنِ قَيْسٍ، قال: كان بينى وبينَ رَجلٍ من اليهودِ أرضٌ، فَجَحَدَنِى، فقَدَّمْتُه إلى النَّبِىِّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- فقال لى رسولُ اللَّهِ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-: "هَلْ لَكَ بَيِّنَةٌ؟ ". قلتُ: لا. قال لليَهُودِىِّ: "احْلِفْ". قلتُ: إذًا يَحْلِفُ، فيَذْهَبُ بمالى. فأَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ عزَّ وجلَّ: {إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَشْتَرُونَ بِعَهْدِ اللَّهِ وَأَيْمَانِهِمْ ثَمَنًا قَلِيلًا} (١٥). إلى آخرِ الآيةِ. روَاه البُخارىُّ وأبو داودَ وابنُ ماجَه (١٦). وفى حديثِ الحَضْرَمِىِّ، قلتُ: إنَّه رجلٌ فاجِرٌ،
(٩) تقدم تخريجه، فى: ١٠/ ٣٦٤.(١٠) تقدم تخريجه، فى: صفحة ٣٢.(١١) أحرجه الإِمام مالك، فى: باب العيب فى الرقيق، من كتاب البيوع. الموطأ ٢/ ٦١٣. والبيهقى، فى: باب بيع البراءة، من كتاب البيوع. السنن الكبرى ٥٠/ ٣٢٨. عبد الرزاق، فى: باب البيع بالبراءة، من كتاب البيوع. المصنف ٨/ ١٦٢، ١٦٣.(١٢) فى أ: "ذلك".(١٣) تقدم تخريجه، فى: ١١/ ٦.(١٤) تقدم تخريجه، فى: ٦/ ٥٨٧.(١٥) سورة آل عمران ٧٧.(١٦) أخرجه البخارى، فى: باب كلام الخصوم بعضهم فى بعض، من كتاب الخصومات، وفى: باب سؤال الحاكم =