This discussion has already passed in the issues of divorce. And Allah the Most High knows best.

1949 - Issue: He said: (And if the first emancipates it while he is poor, and the second emancipates it while he is wealthy, his share and his partner's share become free upon him, and one-third of his wala' (right of patronage) belongs to the first emancipator, and two-thirds belong to the second emancipator.)

The apparent position of the school is that if the poor person emancipates his share of the slave, the emancipation is established in it and does not spread (sari) to the share of his partner; rather, it remains in servitude. Then, when the second person emancipates his share while he is wealthy, all that remains of him becomes free upon him—his share by direct action, and the share of the third partner by spreading—and two-thirds of the wala' become his, and one-third belongs to the first. This is the position of Ishaq, Abu 'Ubayd, Ibn al-Mundhir, Dawud, and Ibn Jarir. It is also the position of Malik and al-Shafi'i, according to the method we established from their statements previously. It is narrated from 'Urwah that he bought a slave whose half had been emancipated, and 'Urwah used to alternate with him: one month as a slave and one month as a free man. It is narrated from Ahmad that if a poor person emancipates his share, the slave is required to work for the value of the share of the others until he fulfills it, and then he becomes free. This is the position of Ibn Shubrumah, Ibn Abi Layla, al-Awza'i, Abu Yusuf, and Muhammad, based on what Abu Hurayrah narrated: The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: "Whoever emancipates a portion he owns in a slave must emancipate the whole if he has wealth, and if he does not, the slave is required to work [without being burdened]." Agreed upon, and Abu Dawud narrated it. Ibn Abi Layla and Ibn Shubrumah said: So when he is required to work...