thousand, so he said to him: 'I am unable.' He said to him: 'Erase your contract.' He replied: 'You erase it.'
Sa'id narrated with his chain of transmission from Amr ibn Shu'ayb, from his father, from his grandfather, that the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, gave a sermon and said: "Whichever man makes a contract with his slave for one hundred uqiyas, and he becomes unable to pay ten uqiyas, then he is a slave." This is because it is a contract for which he is unable to provide the compensation, so the one entitled to it has the right to annul it, like the salam contract (advance payment) if the goods to be delivered are unavailable. Also, it is the annulment of a contract based on consensus, so it does not require a judge, similar to the annulment of the emancipation of a woman married to a slave.
If it is said: 'Why is the kitaba binding upon the master but not binding upon the slave?' We say: On the contrary, it is binding upon both parties. The slave does not have the right to annul it under any circumstances; he only has the right to declare his inability and refrain from working. He only had that right for two reasons: First, the kitaba contains an emancipation conditional upon a state, and whoever suspends the emancipation of his slave upon a condition cannot void it. The emancipation is necessarily triggered by the condition, while the slave is not obligated to fulfill the condition and cannot be forced to do so. Second, the kitaba is for the benefit of the slave, not his master. Thus, the contract is binding upon the one who imposed the benefit of another upon himself, while the beneficiary has the option regarding it, like one who guarantees something for another, acts as a surety for him, or holds a pledge from him.
Section: As for if one installment becomes due and he is unable to pay it, the apparent meaning of al-Khiraqi's words is that the master does not have the right of annulment until two installments become due before their payment. This is one of the two narrations from Ahmad. Al-Qadi said: This is the apparent meaning of our companions' words. It is narrated from Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, and it is the opinion of al-Hakam, Ibn Abi Layla, Abu Yusuf, and al-Hasan ibn Salih. Ibn Abi Musa said: It is narrated from Ahmad that he does not return to slavery until he says: 'I have become unable.' It is also said regarding him: If he has paid the majority of the kitaba wealth, he shall not be returned to slavery, but rather pursued for what remains. The second narration is that if he becomes unable to pay a single installment, his master has the right to annul the kitaba. This is the opinion of al-Harith al-'Ukli, Abu Hanifah, and al-Shafi'i, because the master...
(6) Extracted by al-Bayhaqi, in: The Chapter on the Inability of the Mukatab, from the Book of the Mukatab, Al-Sunan al-Kubra 10/341. And by Abd al-Razzaq, in: The Inability of the Mukatab and Other Things, from the Book of the Mukatab, Al-Musannaf 8/407, 408. (7) Its verification has preceded in: 9/125. (8) Omitted from: B, M. (9) Omitted from: The original, A, B. (10) Omitted from: B. (11) Omitted from: The original.
ألْفًا، فقال له: أنا عاجِزٌ. فقال له: امْحُ كِتابَتكَ. فقال: امْحُ أنْتَ (٦). ورَوَى سعيدٌ، بإسْنادِه عن عمرِو بن شُعَيْبٍ، عن أبِيه، عن جَدِّه، أَنَّ رسولَ اللَّه -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- خَطَبَ، فقال: "أَيُّمَا رَجُلٍ كَاتَبَ غُلَامَهُ عَلَى مِائَةِ أُوقِيَّةٍ، فَعَجَزَ عَنْ عَشْرِ أوَاقٍ، فَهُوَ رَقِيقٌ" (٧) ولأنَّه عَقْدٌ عَجَزَ عن عِوَضِه، فمَلَكَ مُسْتَحِقُّه فَسْخَه، كالسَّلَمِ إذا تَعَذّرَ المُسْلَمُ فيه، ولأنَّه فَسْخُ عَقْدٍ مُجْمَعٍ عليه، فلم يَفْتَقِرْ إلى الحاكمِ، كفَسْخِ المُعْتَقةِ تحتَ العبدِ. فإن قيل: فلمَ كانت الكِتابةُ لازِمَةً مِن جِهَةِ السَّيّدِ، غيرَ لازِمةٍ من جِهَةِ العبدِ؟ قُلْنا: بل (٨) هى لازِمةٌ من جِهَةِ (٩) الطَّرَفَيْنِ، ولا يَمْلِكُ العبدُ (١٠) فَسْخَها بحالٍ، وإنَّما له أن يُعَجِّزَ نَفْسَه، ويَمْتَنِعَ من الكسْبِ، وإنَّما كان له ذلك لوَجْهَيْنِ؛ أحدهما، أَنَّ الكِتابةَ تتَضَمَّنُ إعتْاقًا بصِفةٍ، ومَن عَلَّقَ عِتْقَ عبدِه بصِفَةٍ، لم يَمْلِكْ إبْطالَها، ويَلْزَمُ وقوعُ العِتْقِ بالصِّفَةِ، ولا يَلْزَمُ العَبْدَ الإِتيانُ بالصِّفَةِ، ولا يُجْبَرُ عليها. الثانى، أَنَّ الكِتابةَ لِحَظِّ العبدِ دُونَ سَيِّدِه، فكان العَقْدُ (١١) لازِمًا لمن ألْزَمَ نَفْسَه حَظَّ غيرِه، وصاحِبُ الحَظِّ بالخِيارِ فيه، كمَن ضَمِنَ لغيرِه شيئًا، أو كَفَلَ له، أو رَهَنَ عندَه رَهْنًا.
فصل: فأمَّا إِنْ حَلَّ نَجْمٌ واحدٌ، فعَجَزَ عن أدائِه، فظاهِرُ كلامِ الْخِرَقِىِّ، أنَّه ليس للسَّيِّدِ الفَسْخُ، حتى يَحِلَّ نَجْمانِ قبلَ أدَائِهِما. وهى إحْدَى الرِّوايتَيْنِ عن أحمدَ. قال القاضى: وهو ظاهِرُ كلامِ أصْحابِنا. ورُوِىَ ذلك عن علىٍّ، رَضِىَ اللَّهُ عنه. وهو قولُ الحَكَمِ، وابنِ أبى لَيْلَى، وأبى يوسفَ، والحسنِ بن صالحٍ. وقال ابنُ أبى موسى: ورُوِىَ عن أحمدَ، أنَّه لا يَعُودُ رَقِيقًا حتى يقولَ: قد عَجَزْتُ. وقيل عنه: إذا أدَّى أكثرَ مالِ الكِتابةِ، لم يُرَدَّ إلى الرِّقِّ، وأُتْبِعَ بما بَقِىَ. والرِّواية الثانية، أنَّه إذا عَجَزَ عن نَجْمٍ واحدٍ، فلِسَيِّدِه فَسْخُ الكِتابةِ. وهو قولُ الحارثِ العُكْلِىِّ، وأبى حنيفةَ، والشافعىِّ؛ لأنَّ السَّيِّدَ
(٦) وأخرجه البيهقى، فى: باب عجز المكاتب، من كتاب المكاتب. السنن الكبرى ١٠/ ٣٤١. وعبد الرزاق، فى: عجز المكاتب وغير ذلك، من كتاب المكاتب. المصنف ٨/ ٤٠٧، ٤٠٨.(٧) تقدم تخريجه، فى: ٩/ ١٢٥.(٨) سقط من: ب، م.(٩) سقط من: الأصل، أ، ب.(١٠) سقط من: ب.(١١) سقط من: الأصل.