ShamelaTranslate
بحث
تسجيل الدخول
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. مشروع علمي مفتوح الوصول.

حولتواصلتبرّعبيانات النشرالخصوصيةشروط الاستخدامحق الانسحابإلغاء اشتراك
المغني لابن قدامة - ت التركي
مجلد 2 · صفحة 435فصل

الترجمة · EN

and the rak'ah counted as three rak'ahs are void. This is the opinion of Ishaq and Abu Bakr al-Ajurri. Al-Shafi'i said: It counts for him as two rak'ahs; because when he stood up to the second out of forgetfulness before completing the first, his action in it was void. Thus, when he prostrated in it, its prostration combined with the prostration of the first, and a single rak'ah was completed for him. Likewise, the third and the fourth result in one rak'ah for him from them. Abu Abd Allah narrated this opinion from Al-Shafi'i, then said: It is more similar to what these people—meaning the proponents of rational deduction (as-hab al-ra'y)—say. Al-Athram said: I said to him: If he does that, it is not correct; because he intends with this prostration (only) the second, not the first. He said: I say the same; he needs to perform two prostrations for every rak'ah. It is possible that this reported opinion from Al-Shafi'i is the correct one and that it is a school of thought for Ahmad, because he deemed it good and only excused himself from adopting it due to the fact that he only intended the second prostration for the second rak'ah. This does not prevent it from being attributed to the first, just as if he prostrated in the first rak'ah thinking he was in the second, or prostrated in the second thinking he was in the first. And Allah knows best. Al-Thawri and the proponents of rational deduction said: He prostrates four prostrations immediately. Al-Hasan ibn Salih said regarding one who forgot the two prostrations of every rak'ah: He prostrates eight prostrations immediately. This is invalid, because the order of the prayer is a condition for it, so it does not lapse due to forgetfulness, just as if he performed the prostration before the bowing (ruku') out of forgetfulness. If he does not remember until he has performed the taslim, he restarts the prayer, for he is left with nothing but a rak'ah that lacks a prostration, so when he performs the taslim, it is also invalidated. Ahmad explicitly stated its invalidation in the narration of Al-Athram, and at that point, he must restart the prayer.

Section: If one omits a pillar and then remembers it but does not know its location, he must base the matter on the worst-case scenario, such as if he omits a prostration and does not know whether it is from the fourth or from a preceding rak'ah. He should assign it

الحواشي

(2) In A and M: "minha". (3) In A and M: "nawa". (4) In M there is an addition: "al-rak'ah". (5) In M: "al-rak'ah allati".

العربية (المصدر)

والرَّكْعَةِ المُعْتَدِّ بها ثَلَاثَ رَكَعاتٍ لَاغِيَةٍ. وهذا قَوْلُ إسحاقَ، وأَبى بكرٍ الآجُرِّىّ. وقال الشَّافِعِىُّ: يَصِحُّ له رَكْعَتانِ؛ لأنَّه لمَّا قامَ إلى الثَّانِيَةِ سَهْوًا قبلَ إتْمَامِ الأُولَى، كان عَمَلُه فيها لاغِيًا، فلمَّا سَجد فيها، انْضَمَّتْ سَجْدَتُها إلى سَجْدَةِ الأُولَى، فَكَمُلَتْ له رَكْعَةٌ، وهكذا الثَّالِثَةُ والرَّابِعَةُ يَحْصُلُ له منهما (٢) رَكْعَةٌ. وحَكَى أبو عبدِ اللهِ هذا القَوْلَ عن الشَّافِعِىِّ، ثم قال: هو أشْبَهُ بما يَقُولُ هَؤُلَاءِ - يعني أصْحَابَ الرَّأْىِ - قال الأثْرَمُ: فقلتُ له: فإنَّه إذا فَعَلَ لا يَسْتَقِيمُ؛ لأنَّه إنما يَنْوِى (٣) بهذه السَّجْدَةِ عن الثَّانِيَةِ، لا عن الأُولَى. قال: فكذلك أقولُ، إنَّه يَحْتَاجُ أن يَسْجُدَ لكُلِّ رَكْعَةٍ سَجْدَتَيْنِ. ويَحْتَمِلُ أن يكُونَ هذا القَوْلُ المَحْكِىُّ عن الشَّافِعِىِّ هو الصَّحِيحَ، وأن يكونَ مَذْهَبًا لأحمدَ؛ لأنَّه قد حَسَّنَه، وإنما اعْتَذَرَ عن المَصِيرِ إليه، لِكَوْنِه إنَّما نَوَى بالسَّجْدَةِ الثَّانِيَةِ عن الرَّكْعَةِ الثَّانِيَةِ، وهذا لا يَمْنَعُ جَعْلَها عن الأُولَى، كما لو سجد في الرَّكْعَةِ الأُولَى يَحْسَبُ أنَّه في الثَّانِيَةِ، أو سجد في الثَّانِيَةِ يَحْسَبُ أنَّه في الأُولَى. واللهُ أعْلَمُ. وقال الثَّوْرِىُّ، وأصْحَابُ الرَّأْىِ: يَسْجُدُ في الحَالِ أَرْبَعَ سَجَدَاتٍ. وقال الحسنُ بنُ صَالِحٍ، فِيمَنْ نَسِىَ مِن كلِّ رَكْعَةٍ سَجْدَتَيْها: يَسْجُدُ في الحالِ ثَمَانِىَ سَجَدَاتِ. وهذا فاسِدٌ؛ لأنَّ تَرْتِيبَ الصَّلَاةِ شَرْطٌ فيها، فلا يَسْقُطُ بِالنِّسْيَانِ، كما لو قَدَّمَ السُّجُودَ على الرُّكُوعِ نَاسِيًا، وإن لم يَذْكُرْ حتى سَلَّمَ، ابْتَدَأ الصَّلاةَ؛ فإنَّه لم يَبْقَ له غيرُ رَكْعَةٍ تَنْقُصُ سَجْدَةً، فإذا سَلَّمَ بَطَلَتْ أيضًا. نَصَّ أحمدُ على بُطْلَانِها، في رِوَايَةِ الأثْرَمِ، فَحِينَئِذٍ يَسْتَأْنِفُ الصَّلَاةَ.

فصل: وإذا تَرَكَ رُكْنًا، ثم ذَكَرَه ولم يَعْلَمْ مَوْضِعَه، بَنَى الأمْرَ على أسْوَإِ الأحْوَالِ، مثلَ أنْ يَتْرُكَ سَجْدَةً لا يَعْلَمُ أمِنَ (٤) الرَّابِعَةِ أم مِنْ رَكْعَةٍ (٥) قَبْلَها. جَعَلَها

الحواشي

(٢) في أ، م: "منها".(٣) في أ، م: "نوى".(٤) في م زيادة: "الركعة".(٥) في م: "الركعة التي".

السابقمجلد 2 · صفحة 435التالي
السابق2·435التالي