ShamelaTranslate
بحث
تسجيل الدخول
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. مشروع علمي مفتوح الوصول.

حولتواصلتبرّعبيانات النشرالخصوصيةشروط الاستخدامحق الانسحابإلغاء اشتراك
المغني لابن قدامة - ت التركي
مجلد 4 · صفحة 336فصل

الترجمة · EN

(peace be upon him): "There is no fast for one who does not resolve to fast from the night" (10), without further detail; and because he intended it from the night, his fast is valid, just as if he had intended it during the latter half of the night and did not do anything that invalidates the fast; and because restricting the intention to the latter half of the night leads to missing the fast, as it is the time of sleep, and many people do not wake up then nor remember to fast. The Lawgiver (the Prophet) only granted a concession to advance the intention before its commencement due to the difficulty (11) of considering it at the start, so it should not be restricted to a place where the hardship is not alleviated by such a restriction. Furthermore, restricting it to the latter half of the night is an arbitrary imposition without evidence, and it is not valid to equate fasting with the adhan and the departure from Muzdalifah, because both of those are permissible after dawn, so preventing them in the first half does not lead to missing them, unlike the intention for fasting. Additionally, their restriction to the latter half is in terms of their permissibility, whereas stipulating the intention is a matter of obligation and necessity, such that missing the fast results from missing it during that time, which involves hardship and harm, unlike mere permissibility. Moreover, preventing them in the first half does not lead to them being restricted to the latter half, because they are permitted after dawn, while the intention for fasting is different. As for if he annulled the intention, such as if he intended to break the fast after having intended to fast, that annulled intention does not suffice him, because it has ceased to exist both in ruling and in reality.

Section: If one intends on the day [for the following day] to fast, that intention does not suffice him, unless he carries it over to a part of the night. Ibn Mansur narrated from Ahmad, regarding someone (12) who intends to fast to make up for Ramadan during the day without having intended it from the night, that there is no harm in it, unless he had annulled the intention after that. The apparent meaning of this is that the intention suffices when made during the day, except that al-Qadi said: "This is construed as meaning that he carried the intention over to a part of the night." This is correct.

الحواشي

(10) Its verification was provided previously on page 334. (11) In manuscript M: "for the difficulty". (12) Omitted from A, B, and M.

العربية (المصدر)

السَّلَامُ: "لَا صِيَامَ لِمَنْ لَمْ يُبَيِّتِ الصِّيَامَ مِنَ اللَّيْلِ" (١٠). من غير تَفْصِيلٍ، ولأنَّه نَوَى من اللَّيْلِ، فَصَحَّ صَوْمُه، كما لو نَوَى في النِّصْفِ الأخِيرِ ولم يَفْعَلْ ما يُنافِى الصَّوْمَ، ولأنَّ تَخْصِيصَ النِّيَّةِ بالنِّصْفِ الأَخِيرِ يُفْضِى إلى تَفْوِيتِ الصَّوْمِ؛ لأنَّه وَقْتُ النَّوْمِ، وكَثِيرٌ من النّاسِ لا يَنْتَبِهُ فيه، ولا يَذْكُرُ الصَّوْمَ، والشَّارِعُ إنَّما رَخَّصَ في تَقْدِيمِ النِّيَّةِ على ابْتِدَائِه، لِخُروجِ (١١) اعْتِبَارِها عندَه، فلا يَخُصُّها بمَحَلٍّ لا تَنْدَفِعُ المَشَقَّةُ بِتَخْصِيصِها به، ولأنَّ تَخْصِيصَها بالنِّصْفِ الأَخِيرِ تَحَكُّمٌ من غيرِ دَلِيلٍ، ولا يَصِحُّ اعْتِبَارُ الصَّوْمِ بالأذانِ والدَّفْعِ من مُزْدَلِفَةَ؛ لأنَّهما يَجُوزَانِ بعد الفَجْرِ، فلا يُفْضِى مَنْعُهما في النِّصْفِ الأوَّلِ إلى فَوَاتِهِما، بخِلافِ نِيَّةِ الصَّوْمِ، ولأنَّ اخْتصَاصَهما بالنِّصْفِ الأخِيرِ بمعنى تَجْوِيزِهِما فيه، واشْتِرَاطُ النِّيَّةِ بمعنى الإيجابِ والتَّحَتُّمِ، وفَوَاتِ الصَّوْمِ بِفَوَاتِها فيه، وهذا فيه مَشَقَّةٌ ومَضَرَّةٌ، بخِلافِ التَّجْوِيزِ، ولأنَّ مَنْعَهما في النِّصْفِ الأوَّلِ لا يُفْضِى إلى اخْتِصَاصِهما بالنِّصْفِ الأَخِيرِ، لِجَوَازِهما بعدَ الفَجْرِ، والنِّيَّةُ بخِلافِه، فأمَّا إن فسَخ النِّيَّةَ، مثل إن نَوَى الفِطْرَ بعد نِيَّةِ الصِّيامِ، لم تُجْزِئْه تلك النِّيَّة المَفْسُوخَة، لأنَّها زَالَتْ حُكْمًا وحَقِيقَةً.

فصل: وإن نَوَى من النَّهارِ صَوْمَ الغَدِ، لم تُجْزِئْه تِلْكَ النِّيَّة، إلَّا أن يَسْتَصْحِبَها إلى جُزْءٍ من اللَّيْلِ. وقد رَوَى ابنُ مَنصورٍ، عن أحمدَ، في (١٢) مَن نَوَى الصَّوْمَ عن قَضاءِ رمضانَ بالنَّهَارِ، ولم يَنْوِ من اللَّيْلِ، فلا بَأْسَ، إلَّا أنْ يكونَ فَسَخَ النِّيَّةَ بعدَ ذلك. فظاهِرُ هذا حُصُولُ الإِجْزاءِ بِنِيَّتِه من النَّهارِ، إلَّا أنَّ القاضىَ قال: هذا مَحْمُولٌ على أنَّه اسْتَصْحَبَ النِّيَّةَ إلى جُزْءٍ من اللَّيْلِ. وهذا صَحِيحٌ؛

الحواشي

(١٠) تقدم تخريجه في صفحة ٣٣٤.(١١) في م: "لحرج".(١٢) سقط من: أ، ب، م.

السابقمجلد 4 · صفحة 336التالي
السابق4·336التالي