ShamelaTranslate
بحث
تسجيل الدخول
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. مشروع علمي مفتوح الوصول.

حولتواصلتبرّعبيانات النشرالخصوصيةشروط الاستخدامحق الانسحابإلغاء اشتراك
المغني لابن قدامة - ت التركي
مجلد 6 · صفحة 145فصل

الترجمة · EN

and iron, copper, lead, and the like, they are included in the sale and are owned through ownership of the land in which they are located; for they are part of its constituents, and are thus like its soil and its stones. However, a gold mine may not be sold for gold, nor a silver mine for silver; but it is permissible to sell them for a different species. If a mine appears in the land of which the seller was unaware, he has the option [to rescind], because it is an increase he was not aware of, and it is similar to if he sold someone a garment as being ten, and it turned out to be eleven. This is if he owned the land through reclamation (ihya') or an iqta' (grant). It has been reported that the children of Bilal ibn al-Harith sold land to Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz, and a mine was discovered in it. They said: "We only sold the land, we did not sell the mine." They brought to Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz the document containing the Prophet's—peace and blessings of Allah be upon him—grant (qati'ah) to their father, so Umar took it, kissed it, and returned the mine to them. If the seller owned the land through purchase, it is possible that he has no option, because the right belongs to someone else, who is the first owner. It is also possible that he has the option, just as if one bought a defective item and then sold it without knowing of its defect, for he is entitled to have it returned to him, even if he sold it just as he had bought it. Abu Talib has reported from Ahmad that if a mine appears on one's property, one owns it. The outward implication of this is that he did not assign it to the seller, nor did he grant him an option, because it is one of the constituents of the land, and it is similar to if stones of great value were discovered in it.

Section: If there is a well or a spring developed in the land, the well itself and the land of the spring are owned by the owner of the land, but the water that is in it is not owned, because it flows from underneath the land into his property, and is thus similar to water flowing in a river into his property. This is one of the two views held by the companions of al-Shafi'i. The other view is that it enters into the ownership, because it is the yield of the property. It has been reported from Ahmad what indicates that it is owned; for he said regarding a man who owns land and another who owns water: "The owner of the land and the owner of the water share the crop, and it is between them?" He replied: "There is no harm in that." Abu Bakr chose this view. This indicates that the water is owned by its owner. In the same category as water are minerals that flow within properties, such as asphalt, petroleum, mummy [bitumen], and salt.

الحواشي

(24) See what has preceded in: 4/240, 241, and it preceded in its wording in: 4/245, 246. (25) Omitted from: The original.

العربية (المصدر)

والحَدِيدِ، والنُّحاسِ، والرَّصاصِ، ونحوِها، دَخَلَتْ في البَيْعِ، ومُلِكَتْ بمِلْكِ الأرْضِ التى هى فيها؛ لأنَّها من أجْزائِها، فهى كتُرابِها وأحْجارِها، ولكنْ لا يُباعُ مَعْدِنُ الذَّهَبِ بِذَهَبٍ، ولا مَعْدِنُ الفِضَّةِ بِفِضَّةٍ، ويجوزُ بَيْعُها بغيرِ جِنْسِها. وإن ظَهَرَ في الأرْضِ مَعْدِنٌ لم يَعْلَمِ البائِعُ به، فله الخِيارُ؛ لأنَّه زِيَادَةٌ لم يَعْلَمْ بها، فأشْبَهَ ما لو باعَهُ ثَوْبًا على أنه عشرةٌ، فبانَ أحَدَ عَشَرَ. هذا إذا كان قد مَلَكَ الأرْضَ بإحْياءٍ أو إقْطاعٍ. وقد رُوِىَ أنَّ وَلَدَ بِلالِ بن الحارِثِ باعُوا عُمَرَ بنَ عبدِ العَزِيزِ أرْضًا، فظَهَرَ فيها مَعْدِنٌ، فقالوا: إنَّمَا بِعْنا الأرْضَ، ولم نَبعِ المَعْدِنَ. وأتَوْا عُمَرَ بنَ عبدِ العزيزِ بالكِتابِ الذى فيه قَطِيعَةُ النَّبِيِّ -صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ- لأَبِيهِم، فأخَذَهُ عُمَرُ فَقَبَّلَه، ورَدَّ عليهم المَعْدِنَ (٢٤). وإن كان البائِعُ مَلَكَ الأرْضَ بالبَيْعِ، احتَمَلَ أنْ لا يكونَ له خِيارٌ؛ لأنَّ الحَقَّ لغيرِه، وهو المالِكُ الأولُ. واحْتَمَلَ أنْ يكونَ له الخِيارُ، كما لو اشْتَرَى مَعِيبًا ثم باعَهُ ولم يَعْلَمْ عَيْبَهُ، فإنَّه يَسْتَحِقُّ الرَّدَّ عليه، وإن كان قد باعَهُ مثل ما اشْتراهُ. وقد رَوَى أبو طالِبٍ، عن أحمدَ، أنَّه (٢٥) إذا ظَهَرَ المَعْدِنُ في مِلْكِه مَلَكَهُ. وظاهِرُ هذا أنَّه لم يَجْعَلْه للبائِعِ، ولا جَعَلَ له خِيارًا؛ لأنَّه مِن أجْزاءِ الأرْضِ، فأشْبَهَ ما لو ظَهَرَ فيها حِجارَةٌ لها قِيمَةٌ كَبِيرَةٌ.

فصل: وإذا كان في الأرْضِ بِئْرٌ أو عَيْنٌ مُسْتَنْبَطَةٌ، فنَفْسُ البِئْرِ وأرضُ العَيْنِ مَمْلُوكَةٌ لمالِكِ الأرْضِ، والماءُ الذى فيها غيرُ مَمْلُوكٍ، لأنَّه يَجْرِى من تَحْتِ الأرْضِ إلى مِلْكِه، فأشْبَهَ الماءَ الجارِىَ في النَّهْرِ إلى مِلْكِه، وهذا أحَدُ الوَجْهَيْنِ لأصْحابِ الشَّافِعِيِّ. والوجه الآخَرُ، يَدْخُلُ في المِلْكِ؛ لأنَّه نَماءُ المِلْكِ. وقد رُوِىَ عن أحمدَ ما يَدُلُّ على أنَّه يُمْلَكُ؛ فإنَّه قال في رجُلٍ له أرْضٌ ولآخَرَ ماءٌ، فيَشْتَرِكُ صاحِبُ الأرْضِ وصاحِبُ الماءِ في الزَّرْعِ، ويكون بينهما؟ فقال: لا بأْسَ. اخْتارَهُ أبو بكرٍ. وهذا يَدُلُّ على أنَّ الماءَ مَمْلُوكٌ لِصاحِبِه، وفى مَعْنَى الماءِ، المَعادِنُ الجارِيَةُ

الحواشي

(٢٤) انظر ما تقدم في: ٤/ ٢٤٠، ٢٤١، وتقدم بنصه في: ٤/ ٢٤٥، ٢٤٦.(٢٥) سقط من: الأصل.

السابقمجلد 6 · صفحة 145التالي
السابق6·145التالي