If it is in a land of Islam, then the apparent state is its permissibility, because Muslims do not approve of the sale of things whose sale is not permissible in their land in an overt manner. The second is that whose origin is permissibility, such as water one finds changed, not knowing whether it changed due to impurity or something else. It is pure according to the ruling, because the origin is purity, which does not cease except through certainty or an apparent indication, and neither of these was found. The basis for this is the hadith of 'Abdullah ibn Zayd, who said: A complaint was made to the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, about a man who imagines during prayer that he has experienced something. He said: "He should not depart until he hears a sound or finds an odor." Agreed upon (53). The third is that for which no origin is known, such as a man whose wealth contains both halal and haram. This is the doubtful matter, which is better left alone, according to what we mentioned and acting upon what was narrated from the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, that he found a fallen date and said: "Were I not afraid that it was from the charity, I would have eaten it" (54). This is from the category of piety (wara').
Section: Ahmad, may Allah have mercy on him, would not accept the grants of the Sultan and would disapprove of his son and uncle accepting them, and he was strict regarding that. Among those who did not accept them were Sa'id ibn al-Musayyib, al-Qasim, [Busr] (55) ibn Sa'id, Muhammad ibn Wasi', al-Thawri, and Ibn al-Mubarak. This was done by them out of piety and precaution, not because they considered them haram, for Ahmad said: The grants of the Sultan are dearer to me than charity. He also said: There is no one among the Muslims who does not have a share in these dirhams, so how can I say that it is ill-gotten (suht)? Among those who would accept their grants were Ibn 'Umar, Ibn 'Abbas, 'A'ishah, and others from the Companions, such as al-Hasan, al-Husayn, and 'Abdullah ibn Ja'far. Al-Hasan al-Basri, Makhul, and al-Zuhri granted concessions for it.
(53) Its extraction was previously mentioned in 1/262. (54) Its extraction was previously mentioned in 4/116. Added to the extraction: al-Musnad 3/119, 132, 184, 193, 241, 258, 291, 292. (55) Omitted from the original. In M: "and Bishr". He is Busr ibn Sa'id al-Madani the ascetic, a mawla of Ibn al-Hadrami, a Tabi'i, and he was reliable and narrated many hadiths. He died in Medina in the year 100. Tahdhib al-Tahdhib 1/437, 438.
إنْ كان ذلك فى بَلَدِ الإسلامِ، فالظّاهِرُ إباحَتُها؛ لأنّ المُسْلِمِينَ لا يُقِرُّونَ فى بَلَدِهِم بَيْعَ ما لا يَحِلُّ بَيْعُه ظاهِرًا. والثّانى، ما أصلُه الإباحَةُ، كالماءِ يَجِدُه مُتَغَيِّرًا، لا يَعْلَمُ أبِنَجاسَةٍ تَغَيَّرَ، أم بغَيْرِها؟ فهو طاهِرٌ فى الحُكْمِ؛ لأنّ الأصلَ الطَّهارَةُ، فلا نزُولُ عنها إلّا بِيَقِينٍ أو ظاهِرٍ، ولم يُوجَدْ واحِدٌ مِنهما. والأصلُ فى ذلك حَدِيثُ عبدِ اللهِ ابن زَيْدٍ، قال: شُكِىَ إلى النَّبِىِّ -صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ- الرَّجُلُ يُخَيَّلُ إليه فى الصَّلاةِ أنَّه يَجِدُ الشىءَ، قال: "لَا يَنْصَرِفُ حَتَّى يَسْمَعَ صَوْتًا أوْ يَجِدَ رِيحًا". مُتَّفَقٌ عليه (٥٣). والثّالثُ، ما لا يُعْرَفُ له أصلٌ، كرَجُلٍ فى مالِه حَلالٌ وحَرامٌ، فهذا هو الشُّبهَةُ، التى الأوْلَى تَرْكُها، على ما ذَكَرْنا، وعَمَلًا بما رُوِىَ عن النَّبِىِّ -صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ-، أنَّه وَجَدَ تَمْرَةً ساقِطَةً، فقال: "لَوْلا أنِّى أخْشَى أنَّهَا مِنَ الصَّدَقَةِ لأكَلْتُهَا" (٥٤). وهو مِن بابِ الوَرَعِ.
فصل: وكان أحمدُ، رَحِمَه اللهُ، لا يَقْبَلُ جَوائِزَ السُّلْطانِ، ويُنْكِرُ على وَلَدِه وعَمِّه قَبُولَها، ويُشَدِّدُ فى ذلك، ومِمَّن كان لا يَقْبَلُها سعيدُ بن المُسَيَّبِ، والقاسِمُ، [وبُسْرُ] (٥٥) بن سعيدٍ، ومحمدُ بن وَاسِعٍ، والثَّوْرِىُّ، وابنُ المُبارَكِ، وكان هذا مِنهم على سَبِيلِ الوَرَعِ والتَّوَقِّى، لا على أنَّها حرامٌ، فإنَّ أحمدَ قال: جوائزُ السُّلْطانِ أحَبُّ إلىَّ مِنَ الصَّدَقَةِ. وقال: ليس أحَدٌ مِنَ المسلمين إلّا وله فى هذه الدَّراهِمِ نَصِيبٌ، فكيف أقولُ: إنَّها سُحْتٌ؟ ومِمَّن كان يَقبَلُ جوائزَهم ابنُ عُمرَ، وابنُ عَبّاسٍ، وعائشةُ، وغيرُهم مِنَ الصَّحابَةِ، مِثْلُ الحسنِ، والحُسينِ، وعبدِ اللهِ بن جَعْفَرٍ. ورَخَّصَ فيه الحسنُ البَصرِىُّ، ومَكْحُولٌ، والزُّهْرِىُّ
(٥٣) تقدم تخريجه فى: ١/ ٢٦٢.(٥٤) تقدم تخريجه فى: ٤/ ١١٦. ويضاف إلى التخريج: المسند ٣/ ١١٩، ١٣٢، ١٨٤، ١٩٣، ٢٤١، ٢٥٨، ٢٩١، ٢٩٢.(٥٥) سقط من الأصل. وفى م: "وبشر".وهو بُسْر بن سعيد المدنى العابد، مولى ابن الحضرمى، تابعى، وكان ثقة، كثير الحديث. مات بالمدينة سنة مائة. تهذيب التهذيب ١/ ٤٣٧، ٤٣٨.