from traveling, nor demanding a guarantor, like a safe and short journey. Our argument is that it is a journey that prevents the fulfillment of the debt at its due time, so he has the authority to prevent him from it if he does not secure it with a guarantor or a pledge, similar to a journey after the debt has become due. Furthermore, he does not have the right to delay the debt beyond its due date, and in this disputed form of travel, there is a delay of the debt beyond its due date, therefore he does not have the right to do so, just as he does not have the right to deny it.