ShamelaTranslate
بحث
تسجيل الدخول
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. مشروع علمي مفتوح الوصول.

حولتواصلتبرّعبيانات النشرالخصوصيةشروط الاستخدامحق الانسحابإلغاء اشتراك
المغني لابن قدامة - ت التركي
مجلد 8 · صفحة 148فصل

الترجمة · EN

through revival. This was transmitted by Salih and others. This is also the school of Abu Hanifah and Malik, due to the generality of the reports, and because it is dead land in which no specific group has a right; it is similar to that which has not been subject to the ownership of any owner. Moreover, if it is in the Abode of Islam (Dar al-Islam), it is like lost property found in the Abode of Islam, and if it is in the Abode of Disbelief (Dar al-Kufr), it is like a buried treasure (rikaz).

Section: There is no difference in what we have mentioned between the Abode of War (Dar al-Harb) and the Abode of Islam; this is due to the generality of the reports, and because the cultivated land of the Abode of War is only owned through conquest and overcoming, like the rest of their property. As for what is known to have been owned, but for which no specific owner is known, it is subject to the two narrations. If it is said: "This is the property of a disbeliever which has no sanctity, so it resembles the dwellings of 'Ad, and the statement of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), 'Ancient land belongs to Allah and His Messenger,' has indicated this. And because rikaz is from their property and its finder owns it, so this is more appropriate." We say: His statement, "Ancient land," means that which was previously owned and over which ages have passed; and what was like that, its owner has no authority over it. As for that whose ownership was recent, it is possible that it still has an owner, even if he is not identified, and for this reason, we said: It cannot be owned, according to one of the two narrations. As for rikaz, it is moved and transferred, and this is contrary to land, as evidenced by the fact that lost property in the Abode of Islam is owned after being announced, unlike land.

Section: There is no difference between a Muslim and a Dhimmi regarding revival. Ahmad stipulated this, and Malik and Abu Hanifah also said the same. Malik said: A Dhimmi does not gain ownership through revival in the Abode of Islam. The Qadi said: This is the school of a group of our companions, based on the saying of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him): "The dead land belongs to Allah and His Messenger, then it is yours from me." He combined the dead land and assigned it to the Muslims. And because the dead land of the Abode is among its rights, and the Abode belongs to the Muslims, therefore its dead land belongs to them, like the facilities of a slave. As for our evidence, it is the generality of

الحواشي

(10) In the original: "differs". (11) Recorded by al-Bayhaqi, in: The Chapter on Not Permitting a Dhimmi to Revive [Land]..., from the book Ihya' al-Mawat, Al-Sunan al-Kubra, 6/143. (12) In the original: "then he assigned it".

العربية (المصدر)

بالإِحْياءِ. نَقَلَها صالِحٌ وغيرُه. وهو مذهبُ أبى حنيفةَ، ومالِكٍ؛ لِعُمُومِ الأخْبارِ، ولأنَّها أرْضٌ مَوَاتٌ، لا حَقَّ فيها لِقَوْمٍ بأعْيانِهِم، أشْبَهَتْ ما لم يَجْرِ عليه مِلْكُ مالِكٍ، ولأنَّها إن كانت في دارِ الإِسلامِ، فهى كلُقَطَةِ دارِ الإِسلامِ، وإن كانت في دارِ الكُفْرِ، فهى كالرِّكَازِ.

فصل: ولا فَرْقَ فيما ذَكَرْنا بين دارِ الحَرْبِ ودارِ الإِسلامَ؛ لِعُمُومَ الأخْبارِ، ولأنَّ عامِرَ دارِ الحَرْبِ إنَّما يُمْلَكُ بالقَهْرِ والغَلَبَةِ، كسائِر أمْوَالِهم، فأمَّا ما عُرِفَ أنَّه كان مَمْلُوكًا، ولم يُعْلَمْ له مالِكٌ مُعَيَّنٌ، فهو على الرِّوَايَتَيْنِ. فإن قيل: فهذا مِلْكُ كافِرٍ غيرُ مُحْتَرَمٍ، فأشْبَه دِيَارَ عَادٍ، وقد دَلَّ عليه قولُه عليه السلام: "عَادِىُّ الْأرْضِ لِلهِ ولِرَسُولِه". ولأنَّ الرِّكَازَ من أمْوَالِهِم، ويَمْلِكُه واجِدُه، فهذا أَوْلَى. قُلْنا: قولُه: "عَادِىُّ الأرْضِ". يَعْنِى ما تَقَدَّمَ مِلْكُه، ومَضَتْ عليه الأزْمانُ، وما كان كذلك فلا حُكْمَ لمالِكِه. فأمَّا ما قَرُبَ مِلْكُه، فيَحْتَمِلُ أنَّ له مالِكًا باقِيًا، وإن لم يَتَعَيَّنْ، فلهذا قُلْنا: لا يُمْلَكُ. على إحْدَى الرِّوَايَتَيْنِ. وأمَّا الرِّكَازُ، فإنَّه يُنقَلُ ويُحَوَّلُ، وهذا بخِلَافِ (١٠) الأرْضِ، بِدَلِيلِ أنَّ لُقَطَةَ دَارِ الإِسلامِ تُمْلَكُ بعدَ التَّعْرِيفِ، بخِلَافِ الأرْضِ.

فصل: ولا فَرْقَ بين المُسْلِمِ والذِّمِّىِّ في الإِحْياءِ. نَصَّ عليه أحمدُ. وبه قال مالِكٌ، وأبو حنيفةَ. وقال مالِكٌ: لا يَمْلِكُ الذِّمِّىُّ بالإِحْياءِ في دارِ الإِسلامِ. قال القاضي: وهو مذهبُ جَماعةٍ من أصْحابِنا؛ لقولِ النبيِّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-: "مَوَتَانُ الْأرضِ لِلهِ وَلِرَسُولِه، ثُمَّ هِىَ لَكُمْ مِنِّى" (١١). فجَمَعَ المَوتَانَ، وجَعَلَه (١٢) لِلْمُسْلِمينَ. ولأنَّ مَوَتانَ الدَّارِ من حُقُوقِها، والدَّارُ لِلْمُسلمين، فكان مَوَاتُها لهم، كمَرَافِقِ المَمْلُوكِ. ولَنا، عُمُومُ

الحواشي

(١٠) في الأصل: "يخالف".(١١) أخرجه البيهقي، في: باب لا يترك ذمى يحييه. . ., من كتاب إحياء الموات. السنن الكبرى ٦/ ١٤٣.(١٢) في الأصل: "ثم جعله".

السابقمجلد 8 · صفحة 148التالي
السابق8·148التالي