a whip. They both said to me: "Throw it away," but I refused. When (22) we arrived in Medina, I went to Ubayy ibn Ka'b and mentioned that to him, and he said: "You have done well." Al-Tirmidhi said: "This is a good, authentic (hasan sahih) hadith." The Shafi'iyyah have three views on it, just as there are three schools of thought. Our argument for invalidating their specific limit—based on what they mentioned—is that the hadith of Zayd ibn Khalid is general regarding every lost item, so it must be kept in its general sense, except for what has been excluded by evidence. There is no revealed text (nass) for what they mentioned, nor is it in the meaning of what has been addressed by a text. Furthermore, determining and measuring cannot be known through analogy (qiyas); rather, it is taken from a text or consensus (ijma'), and there is neither a text nor consensus in what they have mentioned. As for the hadith of Ali, it is weak; Abu Dawud narrated it and said: "All its chains of narration are shaky (mudtariba)." Moreover, it contradicts their own school of thought and the rest of the schools, so it must be interpreted in a way other than as lost property (luqata)—either because he was in a state of necessity or otherwise. The hadith of Aisha is a specific case, and it is not known what the value of the ring was; furthermore, it is merely the statement of a Companion, and the same applies to the hadith of Ali (24), and they (the opponents) do not consider that to be a proof. The rest of the hadiths do not contain a set measure, but it is permissible to take what the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) mentioned, and he specifically allowed for the taking of a whip, a stick, a rope, [and what is of similar value]. (25) Sheikh Abu al-Faraj (26) estimated it in his book as being less than a qirat, but its limitation is not valid for the reasons we have mentioned.
Section: If one delays the announcement beyond the first year, while being able to do so, one has sinned; because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) commanded it therein, and the command implies obligation. He also said in the hadith of Iyad ibn Himar: "Do not conceal it and do not hide it." (27) This is because such action is a means to ensuring the owner does not find it, as it is apparent that after the year, the owner despairs of it, ceases to care for it, and gives up searching for it.
(22) In MS: "until". (23) Omitted from M. (24) Omitted from the original. (25) In M: "and what is its value". (26) Meaning Ibn al-Jawzi, Abd al-Rahman ibn Ali, who died in the year 597 AH. (27) The complete hadith will come in the following issue, and the author mentions that al-Nasa'i narrated it, in al-Sunan al-Kubra. See: =
سَوْطًا، فقَالَا لِى: ألْقِهِ. فأبَيْتُ، فلمَّا (٢٢) قَدِمْنَا المَدِينَةَ، أتَيْتُ أُبَىَّ بنَ كَعْبٍ، فذَكَرْتُ ذلك له، فقال: أصَبْتَ. قال التِّرْمِذِىُّ: هذا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ. وللشافِعِيّةِ فيه (٢٣) ثلاثةُ أوْجُهٍ كالمَذَاهِبِ الثَّلَاثَةِ. ولَنا، على إبْطالِ تَحْدِيدِه بما ذَكَرُوه، أنَّ حَدِيثَ زَيْدِ بن خالِدٍ عامٌّ في كلِّ لُقَطَةٍ، فيَجِبُ إبْقاؤُه على عُمُومِه، إلَّا ما خرَج منه بالدَّلِيلِ، ولم يَرِدْ بما ذَكَرُوه نَصٌّ، ولا هو في مَعْنَى ما وَرَدَ النَّصُّ به. ولأنَّ التَّحْدِيدَ والتَّقْدِيرَ لا يُعْرَفُ بالقِيَاسِ، وإنَّما يُؤْخَذُ من نَصٍّ أو إجْماعٍ، وليس فيما ذَكَرُوه نصٌّ ولا إجماعٌ. وأمَّا حَدِيثُ علِىٍّ، فهو ضَعِيفٌ، رَوَاه أبو داوُدَ وقال: طُرُقُهُ كلها مُضْطَرِبةٌ. ثم هو مُخَالِفٌ لِمَذْهَبِهِم ولِسَائِرِ المَذَاهِبِ، فتَعَيَّنَ حَمْلُه على وَجْهٍ من الوُجُوه غيرِ اللُّقَطَةِ، إمَّا لِكَوْنِه مُضْطَرًّا إليه أو غيرِ ذلك، وحَدِيثُ عائِشَةَ قَضِيَّةٌ في عَيْنٍ، لا يُدْرَى كم قَدْرُ الخاتَمِ، ثم هو قول صَحَابِىٍّ، وكذلك حَدِيثُ عَلِىٍّ (٢٤)، وهم لا يَرَوْنَ ذلك حُجَّةً، وسائِرُ الأحادِيثِ ليس فيها تَقْدِيرٌ، لكن يُبَاحُ أخْذُ ما ذَكَرَه النبيُّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم-، وخَصَّ في أخْذِه من السَّوْطِ والعَصَا والحَبْلِ، [وما قِيمتُه كقِيمَةِ ذلك] (٢٥). وقَدَّرَه الشيخُ أبو الفَرَجِ (٢٦) في كِتَابِه بما دون القِيرَاطِ، ولا يَصِحُّ تَحْدِيدُه لما ذَكرْنا.
فصل: إذا أَخَّرَ التَّعْرِيفَ عن الحَوْلِ الأوَّلِ، مع إمْكانِه، أَثِمَ؛ لأنَّ النبيَّ -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- أمَرَ به فيه، والأمْرُ يَقْتَضِى الوُجُوبَ. وقال في حَدِيثِ عِيَاضِ بن حِمَارٍ: "لا يَكْتمُ ولَا يُغَيِّبُ" (٢٧). ولأنَّ ذلك وَسِيلَةٌ إلى أن لا يَعْرِفَها صَاحِبُها، فإنَّ الظاهِرَ أنَّه بعدَ
(٢٢) في م: "حتى".(٢٣) سقط من: م.(٢٤) سقط من: الأصل.(٢٥) في م: "وما قيمة ذلك".(٢٦) يعني ابن الجوزى عبد الرحمن بن على، المتوفى سنة سبع وتسعين وخمسمائة.(٢٧) يأتى الحديث بتمامه في المسألة التالية، ويذكر المصنف أن النسائي رواه، وذلك في السنن الكبرى. انظر: =