In every instance where we have ruled that the contract is corrupt (fasid), if separation occurs before consummation, she has no dower. If it occurs after, she is entitled to the dower of a peer (mahr al-mithl) or the specified dower, according to the disagreement we have previously mentioned. In every instance where the marriage is rescinded while maintaining the position that it is valid, if before consummation, she has nothing. If it is after, she is entitled to the specified dower, because it is a rescission that occurred upon a marriage, thus resembling divorce.

Section: If he was deceived regarding her lineage and it turned out to be lower, and that was a defect concerning equality (kafa'a), and we hold that the marriage is valid, she has the option [to rescind]. If she chooses to confirm it, her guardians have the right to object to her. If it did not defect from equality, she has no option, because that is not considered in marriage, resembling the case if she stipulated that he be a scholar and it turned out otherwise. Similarly, if she stipulated something other than lineage, if it is something considered in equality, it is as if it turned out that he is not equal to her in lineage. If it is not considered in equality, such as scholarship, beauty, and similar things, she has no option, because that is something that does not affect the marriage, so stipulating it has no effect. It was mentioned in the case where his lineage turned out to be lower than what he mentioned that there is a view regarding the establishment of the option for her even if it did not defect from equality, but the preferred view is what we have mentioned. And Allah knows best.

1133 - Issue: He said: "And if the one deceived is a slave, his children are free, and he shall pay their ransom when he is freed, and he shall have recourse against the one who deceived him."

In summary, if the one deceived is a slave, his children are free. Abu Hanifa said: They are slaves.