and they suckle together, or she milks her breast milk into a vessel and gives it to them to drink, the marriage of all of them is rescinded; because they have become sisters in his marriage. He has the right to marry whomever he wishes among the young girls, because their prohibition is a prohibition of combination, not a prohibition of perpetuity, as they are stepdaughters whose mother he has not consummated with. And if he has consummated with the adult woman, everything becomes forbidden to him forever, because they are stepdaughters whose mother he has consummated with. This is according to the first narration. According to the other, when she suckled the first, her marriage and the marriage of the adult woman were rescinded because she became her daughter, and they were combined in his marriage. Then she suckled the second, and her marriage was not rescinded because she was solitary in the suckling [within the marriage]. Then when she suckled the third, they became two sisters, so their marriage was rescinded.

Section: If the adult woman's daughter suckles them, it is as if her mother had suckled them. If she had three daughters, and each one of them suckled one of the wives among the young girls, the adult woman becomes forbidden through the suckling of the first of them, and he has recourse against her suckler for what he became liable for of her dowry, because she corrupted her marriage. The marriage of the young girls is not rescinded, because they did not become sisters; they are only daughters of maternal aunts. According to the other narration, the marriage of the first suckled girl is rescinded due to her gathering with her grandmother in the marriage, while the marriage of the latter two remains valid, and he has recourse for what he became liable for of the dowry of the one whose marriage was corrupted against the one who suckled her. And if he had consummated with the adult woman, everything becomes forbidden to him forever, and he has recourse against each one for what he became liable for of the dowry of the one she suckled. And if we say that he has recourse for the dowry of the adult woman, he has recourse for it against the first suckler, because she is the one who corrupted her marriage.