ShamelaTranslate
بحث
تسجيل الدخول
ShamelaTranslate

© 2026 ShamelaTranslate. مشروع علمي مفتوح الوصول.

حولتواصلتبرّعبيانات النشرالخصوصيةشروط الاستخدامحق الانسحابإلغاء اشتراك
المغني لابن قدامة - ت التركي
مجلد 9 · صفحة 437١١٣١ - مسألة؛ قال: (فإن دخل بها، فعلى سيده خمسا المهر. كما قال عثمان [ابن عفان]، رضى الله عنه، إلا أن يجاوز الخمسان قيمته، فلا يلزم سيده أكثر من قيمته، أو يسلمه)

الترجمة · EN

He said: "This hadith is munkar (denounced)." It was also narrated from Ibn Umar, in mawquf form, as one of his own statements. Furthermore, it is a marriage that lacks its prerequisite, so it is not valid, just as if he had married her without witnesses.

1131 - Issue: He said: "If he has consummated the marriage with her, then the master owes one-fifth of the dower, as Uthman ibn Affan (may Allah be pleased with him) said, unless the two-fifths exceed its value, in which case his master is not liable for more than its value, or he hands him over [to the woman]."

There are five sections in this issue:

First: Regarding the obligation of the dower, there are two states for it. One is that he has not consummated the marriage with her; in this case, she is entitled to no dower, because it is an invalid contract, so it does not necessitate anything by its mere existence, like an invalid sale. Such is the case with all invalid marriages; they do not necessitate anything by their mere existence. The second state is that he has intercourse with her; the correct view in the school is that the dower becomes obligatory. A group narrated this from him. Hanbal narrated from him that she has no dower if the slave marries without the permission of his master. This can be interpreted as referring to the state before consummation, thus being consistent with the narration of the group, and it can be interpreted in its general sense as meaning the absence of a dowry. This is the view of Ibn Umar. Al-Athram narrated from Nafi' that he said: Whenever a slave of Ibn Umar would marry without his permission, he would lash him with the prescribed punishment and say to the woman: "You have made your private parts lawful [for him]," and he would invalidate her dower. Its reasoning is that he had intercourse with a consenting woman outside of a valid marriage, so no dower is necessitated by it, like one who consents to adultery. Al-Qadi said: This applies if they were both aware of the prohibition; as for if the woman was ignorant of that, she is entitled to the dower, because it does not fall short of the status of intercourse based on a misconception.

الحواشي

(5) In A, B, M: "and it was narrated by". (6) In M: "Abu 'Umar". An error. (7) See: Sunan Abi Dawud, the previous location. (1) Omitted from: M. (2) In M: "from". (3) Extracted by al-Bayhaqi, in: The Chapter on the Marriage of a Slave Without the Permission of His Owner, from The Book of Marriage. al-Sunan al-Kubra 7/127. And Ibn Abi Shaybah, in: The Chapter on Whoever Disliked for a Slave to Marry Without the Permission of His Master and Said: If He Marries, He Is an Adulterer, from The Book of Marriage. al-Musannaf 4/261, 262. And Sa'id ibn Mansur, in: The Chapter on a Slave Who Marries Without the Permission of His Master. al-Sunan 1/207.

العربية (المصدر)

فقال: هذا حَدِيثٌ مُنْكَرٌ. ورُوِىَ (٥) أيضًا عن ابن عمر (٦) مَوْقُوفًا عليه من قولِهِ (٧). ولأنَّه نِكاحٌ فَقَدَ شَرْطَه، فلم يَصِحَّ كما لو تَزَوَّجَها بغيرِ شُهُودٍ.

١١٣١ - مسألة؛ قال: (فَإِنْ دَخَلَ بِهَا، فَعَلَى سَيِّده خمْسَا الْمَهْرِ. كَمَا قَالَ عُثْمَانُ [ابنُ عَفَّانَ] (١)، رَضِىَ اللَّهُ عَنهُ، إلَّا أنْ يُجَاوِز الخُمْسَانِ قِيمَتَهُ، فلا يَلْزَمُ سَيِّدهُ أَكْثَرُ مِنْ قِيمَتِهِ، أو يُسَلِّمُهُ)

فى هذه المسألة خمسةُ فصولٍ:

الأوَّل: فى وُجُوبِ المَهْرِ، وله حَالان؛ أحدُهما، أن لا يَدْخُلَ بها، فلا مَهْرَ لها؛ لأنَّه عَقْدٌ باطِلٌ، فلا يُوجِبُ بمُجَرَّدِه شيئًا، كالبَيْعِ الباطلِ. وهكذا سائرُ الأنْكِحةِ الفاسِدَةِ، لا تُوجِبُ بمُجَرَّدِها شيئا. الحال الثانى، أن يُصِيبَها، فالصحيحُ فى (٢) المَذْهَبِ أَنَّ المَهْرَ يَجِبُ. روَاه عنه جماعةٌ. ورَوَى عنه حَنْبلٌ، أنَّه لا مَهْرَ لها إذا تَزَوَّجَ العَبْدُ بغيرِ إذْنِ سَيِّدِه. وهذا يُمْكِنُ حَمْلُه على ما قَبْلَ الدُّخُولِ، فيكونُ موافِقًا لرِوايةِ الجماعةِ، ويُمْكِنُ حَمْلُه على عُمُومِه فى عَدَمِ الصَّدَاقِ. وهو قولُ ابنِ عمرَ. رَواه الأثْرَمُ، عن نافعٍ، قال: كان إذا تَزَوَّجَ مَمْلُوكٌ لابنِ عمرَ بغيرِ إذْنِه، جَلَدَه الحَدَّ، وقال للمرأةِ: إنَّكِ أبَحْتِ فَرْجَكِ. وأبْطَلَ صَدَاقَها (٣). ووَجْهُه أَنَّه وَطِئَ امْرأةً مُطاوِعةً فى غيرِ نِكاحٍ صحيحٍ، فلم يَجِبْ به مَهْرٌ، كالمُطاوِعةِ على الزِّنَى. قال القاضى: هذا إذا كانا عالِمَيْنِ بالتَّحْرِيِم، فأمَّا إن جَهِلَتِ المرأةُ ذلك، فلها المَهْرُ؛ لأنَّه لا يَنْقُصُ عن وَطْءِ

الحواشي

(٥) فى أ، ب، م: "ورواه".(٦) فى م: "أبى عمر". خطأ.(٧) انظر: سنن أبى داود، الموضع السابق.(١) سقط من: م.(٢) فى م: "من".(٣) أخرجه البيهقى، فى: باب نكاح العبد بغير إذن مالكه، من كتاب النكاح. السنن الكبرى ٧/ ١٢٧. وابن أبى شيبة، فى: باب من كره للعبد أن يتزوج بغير إذن سيده وقال: إن تزوج فهو عاهر، من كتاب النكاح. المصنف ٤/ ٢٦١، ٢٦٢. وسعيد بن منصور، فى: باب العبد يتزوج بغير إذن سيده. السنن ١/ ٢٠٧.

السابقمجلد 9 · صفحة 437التالي
السابق9·437التالي